An Evaluation and Comparison of Machine Learning Methods for Prediction of Lubricant Film Thickness

Lubricant film thickness is a tribological parameter that significantly impacts the performance of a tribo-system, primarily by affecting the resulting friction and wear. Measuring or predicting film thickness is therefore crucial for any hydrodynamically lubricated machine element. Numerical techniques are often employed to solve the film thickness under specified operating conditions. However, those approaches are computationally expensive and time-consuming. Machine learning methods have been proven to be a highly accurate and faster alternative to predicting lubricant film thickness. Still, these methods have their own benefits and drawbacks with regards to accuracy, speed, and model interpretability. In this paper, a speed/accuracy comparison is provided between the numerical solution, artificial neural network, and other machine learning approaches for determination of lubricant film thickness. It is found that non-ANN methods can be ideal in cases where prediction time is prioritized while high accuracy is still desired; the tested non-ANN models are orders of magnitude faster than both the numerical solution and the ANN approach, while accuracy is still high with a maximum R<sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">2</sup> score of 0.997. This finding, combined with the possible benefit of easy and accurate model interpretability, shows that non-ANN methods can be very useful for this application.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-12-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/icmla61862.2024.00262
Primary Topic
Lubricants and Their Additives
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

An Evaluation and Comparison of Machine Learning Methods for Prediction of Lubricant Film Thickness

Caleb Combs, C. Fred Higgs, Edgar Avalos-Gauna
Lubricants and Their Additives
article

An Evaluation and Comparison of Machine Learning Methods for Prediction of Lubricant Film Thickness

Caleb Combs, C. Fred Higgs, Edgar Avalos-Gauna
article en

Abstract

Lubricant film thickness is a tribological parameter that significantly impacts the performance of a tribo-system, primarily by affecting the resulting friction and wear. Measuring or predicting film thickness is therefore crucial for any hydrodynamically lubricated machine element. Numerical techniques are often employed to solve the film thickness under specified operating conditions. However, those approaches are computationally expensive and time-consuming. Machine learning methods have been proven to be a highly accurate and faster alternative to predicting lubricant film thickness. Still, these methods have their own benefits and drawbacks with regards to accuracy, speed, and model interpretability. In this paper, a speed/accuracy comparison is provided between the numerical solution, artificial neural network, and other machine learning approaches for determination of lubricant film thickness. It is found that non-ANN methods can be ideal in cases where prediction time is prioritized while high accuracy is still desired; the tested non-ANN models are orders of magnitude faster than both the numerical solution and the ANN approach, while accuracy is still high with a maximum R<sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">2</sup> score of 0.997. This finding, combined with the possible benefit of easy and accurate model interpretability, shows that non-ANN methods can be very useful for this application.

Rice University (US)
Loughborough University
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Lubricants and Their Additives
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

An Evaluation and Comparison of Machine Learning Methods for Prediction of Lubricant Film Thickness — Caleb Combs, C. Fred Higgs, et al. · (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS