Quantifying Influencer Impact on Affective Polarization

In today's digital age, social media platforms playa crucial role in shaping public opinion. This study explores how discussions led by influencers on Twitter, now known as ‘X’, affect public sentiment and contribute to online polarization. We developed a counterfactual framework to analyze the polarization scores of conversations in scenarios both with and without the presence of an influential figure. Two case studies, centered on the polarizing issues of climate change and gun control, were examined. Our research highlights the significant impact these figures have on public discourse, providing valuable insights into how online discussions can influence societal divisions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-12-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/icmla61862.2024.00174
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Media Influence and Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
7.82
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Quantifying Influencer Impact on Affective Polarization

Gabriel Terejanu, Rezaur Rashid, Shannon E. Reid, Joshua Melton et al.
2 citations
Media Influence and Health
7.82
article

Quantifying Influencer Impact on Affective Polarization

Gabriel Terejanu, Rezaur Rashid, Shannon E. Reid, Joshua Melton, Siddharth Krishnan, Ouldouz Ghorbani
article en
2 citations

Abstract

In today's digital age, social media platforms playa crucial role in shaping public opinion. This study explores how discussions led by influencers on Twitter, now known as ‘X’, affect public sentiment and contribute to online polarization. We developed a counterfactual framework to analyze the polarization scores of conversations in scenarios both with and without the presence of an influential figure. Two case studies, centered on the polarizing issues of climate change and gun control, were examined. Our research highlights the significant impact these figures have on public discourse, providing valuable insights into how online discussions can influence societal divisions.

University of North Carolina at Charlotte (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Media Influence and Health
7.82
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.