Data-driven justice: Survey on approaches to identify and mitigate biases to build fair artificial intelligent models for Indian justice system

Artificial Intelligence (AI) is widely used in decision-making systems, including the criminal justice system. Automated decision-making systems can speed up the handling of cases and improve consistency and efficiency. These systems were expected to enhance transparency and equip judges with data-driven insights. AI in criminal justice also pointed out concerns about bias and fairness. The idea is to build more inclusive legal systems. This paper explored different sources of potential biases in the judiciary. We compared different approaches to identify and measure the biases. We also reviewed techniques for bias mitigation, such as in-processing, pre-processing, and post-processing approaches. This work aims to comprehensively understand how to build fair AI models. We examined the widely used datasets and the fairness metrics used for evaluation. Most of the work on addressing biases is done in the Western context, leaving a notable gap in the Indian context. India, a country with rich diversity and a complex legal structure, needs AI models that are accurate and also equitable across different demographics to ensure justice and equity for all citizens. To achieve that, India needs bias detection and mitigation approaches that suit the Indian context, as well as evaluation metrics to measure fairness in decisions influenced by gender, caste, religion, etc. The approaches discussed in this paper were supported by case studies that explain the historical and cultural dimensions of the Indian judiciary.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Intelligent Decision Technologies
Published
2025-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/18724981241301281
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.37
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Data-driven justice: Survey on approaches to identify and mitigate biases to build fair artificial intelligent models for Indian justice system

Keerthi Lingam, Suresh Chittineni
1 citations
Intelligent Decision Technologies
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
2.37
article

Data-driven justice: Survey on approaches to identify and mitigate biases to build fair artificial intelligent models for Indian justice system

Keerthi Lingam, Suresh Chittineni
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Artificial Intelligence (AI) is widely used in decision-making systems, including the criminal justice system. Automated decision-making systems can speed up the handling of cases and improve consistency and efficiency. These systems were expected to enhance transparency and equip judges with data-driven insights. AI in criminal justice also pointed out concerns about bias and fairness. The idea is to build more inclusive legal systems. This paper explored different sources of potential biases in the judiciary. We compared different approaches to identify and measure the biases. We also reviewed techniques for bias mitigation, such as in-processing, pre-processing, and post-processing approaches. This work aims to comprehensively understand how to build fair AI models. We examined the widely used datasets and the fairness metrics used for evaluation. Most of the work on addressing biases is done in the Western context, leaving a notable gap in the Indian context. India, a country with rich diversity and a complex legal structure, needs AI models that are accurate and also equitable across different demographics to ensure justice and equity for all citizens. To achieve that, India needs bias detection and mitigation approaches that suit the Indian context, as well as evaluation metrics to measure fairness in decisions influenced by gender, caste, religion, etc. The approaches discussed in this paper were supported by case studies that explain the historical and cultural dimensions of the Indian judiciary.

Intelligent Decision TechnologiesVol. 19(2)
GITAM University (IN)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
2.37
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.