Finding an Optimal Small Sample of Training Dataset for Computer Vision Deep-Learning Models

While the typical approach in deep learning is “more data, better model,” in this work, we would like to explore an alternative setting where the training phase has limited resources in terms of time, memory, or computing, and we cannot use a large training dataset but only a radically small sample of it. For such a setting, we present a novel method to select a subset of the training instances that outperform naive random sampling and produce a higher model accuracy. We analyze the proposed method's running time to show its efficiency, and provide a simulation study over three benchmark datasets (MNIST, CIFAR-10, and SVHN) to demonstrate its advantage compared to random sampling. The proposed method derives significantly better models, especially for radically small training sizes, reaching a peak of hundreds of percentage improvement for the MNIST dataset, 31% for CIFAR-10, and 11% for SVHN.

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2024-12-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/icmla61862.2024.00223
Primary Topic
Advanced Data Processing Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Finding an Optimal Small Sample of Training Dataset for Computer Vision Deep-Learning Models

Aviv Yehezkel, Eyal Elyashiv
Advanced Data Processing Techniques
article

Finding an Optimal Small Sample of Training Dataset for Computer Vision Deep-Learning Models

Aviv Yehezkel, Eyal Elyashiv
article en

Abstract

While the typical approach in deep learning is “more data, better model,” in this work, we would like to explore an alternative setting where the training phase has limited resources in terms of time, memory, or computing, and we cannot use a large training dataset but only a radically small sample of it. For such a setting, we present a novel method to select a subset of the training instances that outperform naive random sampling and produce a higher model accuracy. We analyze the proposed method's running time to show its efficiency, and provide a simulation study over three benchmark datasets (MNIST, CIFAR-10, and SVHN) to demonstrate its advantage compared to random sampling. The proposed method derives significantly better models, especially for radically small training sizes, reaching a peak of hundreds of percentage improvement for the MNIST dataset, 31% for CIFAR-10, and 11% for SVHN.

Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Advanced Data Processing Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.