Evaluating Adversarial Attacks on Traffic Sign Classifiers Beyond Standard Baselines

Adversarial attacks on traffic sign classification models were among the first successfully tried in the real world. Since then, the research in this area has been mainly restricted to repeating baseline models, such as LISA-CNN or GTSRB-CNN, and similar experiment settings, including white and black patches on traffic signs. In this work, we decouple model architectures from the datasets and evaluate on further generic models to make a fair comparison. Furthermore, we compare two attack settings, inconspicuous and visible, which are usually regarded without direct comparison. Our results show that standard baselines like LISA-CNN or GTSRB-CNN are significantly more susceptible than the generic ones. We, therefore, suggest evaluating new attacks on a broader spectrum of baselines in the future. Our code is available at https://github.com/KASTEL-MobilityLab/attacks-on-traffic-sign-recognition/.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-12-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/icmla61862.2024.00216
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.35
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating Adversarial Attacks on Traffic Sign Classifiers Beyond Standard Baselines

J. Marius Zöllner, Svetlana Pavlitska, Leopold Müller
1 citations
Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning
0.35
article

Evaluating Adversarial Attacks on Traffic Sign Classifiers Beyond Standard Baselines

J. Marius Zöllner, Svetlana Pavlitska, Leopold Müller
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Adversarial attacks on traffic sign classification models were among the first successfully tried in the real world. Since then, the research in this area has been mainly restricted to repeating baseline models, such as LISA-CNN or GTSRB-CNN, and similar experiment settings, including white and black patches on traffic signs. In this work, we decouple model architectures from the datasets and evaluate on further generic models to make a fair comparison. Furthermore, we compare two attack settings, inconspicuous and visible, which are usually regarded without direct comparison. Our results show that standard baselines like LISA-CNN or GTSRB-CNN are significantly more susceptible than the generic ones. We, therefore, suggest evaluating new attacks on a broader spectrum of baselines in the future. Our code is available at https://github.com/KASTEL-MobilityLab/attacks-on-traffic-sign-recognition/.

Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (DE), FZI Research Center for Information Technology (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning
0.35
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.