Evaluating Text Summaries Generated by Large Language Models Using OpenAI's GPT

This research examines the effectiveness of OpenAI's GPT models as independent evaluators of text summaries generated by six transformer-based models from Hugging Face: DistilBART, BERT, ProphetNet, T5, BART, and PEGASUS. We evaluated these summaries based on the essential properties of a high-quality summary: concision, relevance, coherence, and readability using traditional metrics such as ROUGE and Latent Semantic Analysis (LSA). Uniquely, we employ GPT not as a summarizer, but as an evaluator, allowing it to independently assess summary quality without predefined metrics. Our analysis revealed significant correlations between GPT evaluations and traditional metrics, particularly in assessing relevance and coherence. The results demonstrate the potential of GPT as a robust tool for evaluating text summaries, providing insights that complement established metrics while providing a basis for comparative analysis of transformer-based models in natural language processing tasks.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-12-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/icmla61862.2024.00140
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Topic Modeling
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.74
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating Text Summaries Generated by Large Language Models Using OpenAI's GPT

Jugal Kalita, Mamoun Mardini, Zeydy Ortiz, Atqiya Munawara Mahi et al.
5 citations
Topic Modeling
1.74
article

Evaluating Text Summaries Generated by Large Language Models Using OpenAI's GPT

Jugal Kalita, Mamoun Mardini, Zeydy Ortiz, Atqiya Munawara Mahi, Hassan Shakil, Phuoc Nguyen
article en
5 citations

Abstract

This research examines the effectiveness of OpenAI's GPT models as independent evaluators of text summaries generated by six transformer-based models from Hugging Face: DistilBART, BERT, ProphetNet, T5, BART, and PEGASUS. We evaluated these summaries based on the essential properties of a high-quality summary: concision, relevance, coherence, and readability using traditional metrics such as ROUGE and Latent Semantic Analysis (LSA). Uniquely, we employ GPT not as a summarizer, but as an evaluator, allowing it to independently assess summary quality without predefined metrics. Our analysis revealed significant correlations between GPT evaluations and traditional metrics, particularly in assessing relevance and coherence. The results demonstrate the potential of GPT as a robust tool for evaluating text summaries, providing insights that complement established metrics while providing a basis for comparative analysis of transformer-based models in natural language processing tasks.

University of Massachusetts Lowell (US), University of Kansas (US), University of Florida (US), University of Colorado Colorado Springs (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Topic Modeling
1.74
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.