Capacity Analysis of LEO Mega-Constellations With Quasi-Torus Topologies

The network topology is a typical element that affects the network capacity of low Earth orbit (LEO) mega-constellations. Considering the relative relationship between satellites, most mega-constellations with inclined orbits adopt the classic torus-like topology in which each satellite establishes four inter-satellite links (ISLs) with neighboring satellites. However, do we need so many ISLs to achieve the required capacity? In this paper, we provide an in-depth capacity analysis for quasi-torus topologies in which each satellite is connected by fewer than four ISLs. Based on the topological regularity and constellation scale, we first introduce the models of typical quasi-torus topologies. Considering that all the satellites are not symmetrical, we divide a quasi-torus topology into the same regions exhibiting axial symmetry. Combining the uniform traffic distribution and the symmetry of each region, we derive the closed-form formulae of network capacity by determining the maximum traffic load among ISLs. The formulae provide insights into the impact of ISL distribution and the constellation scale. Simulation results validate the theoretical analysis and show that the quasi-torus topology with fewer ISLs can achieve high capacity comparable to the torus-like topology. The theoretical analysis obtained is instrumental to the topology design of mega-constellations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
IEEE Transactions on Communications
Published
2025-03-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/tcomm.2025.3547752
Primary Topic
Spacecraft Dynamics and Control
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Capacity Analysis of LEO Mega-Constellations With Quasi-Torus Topologies

Jiandong Li, Min Sheng, Di Zhou, Tianyu Lan
IEEE Transactions on Communications
Spacecraft Dynamics and Control
article

Capacity Analysis of LEO Mega-Constellations With Quasi-Torus Topologies

Jiandong Li, Min Sheng, Di Zhou, Tianyu Lan
article en

Abstract

The network topology is a typical element that affects the network capacity of low Earth orbit (LEO) mega-constellations. Considering the relative relationship between satellites, most mega-constellations with inclined orbits adopt the classic torus-like topology in which each satellite establishes four inter-satellite links (ISLs) with neighboring satellites. However, do we need so many ISLs to achieve the required capacity? In this paper, we provide an in-depth capacity analysis for quasi-torus topologies in which each satellite is connected by fewer than four ISLs. Based on the topological regularity and constellation scale, we first introduce the models of typical quasi-torus topologies. Considering that all the satellites are not symmetrical, we divide a quasi-torus topology into the same regions exhibiting axial symmetry. Combining the uniform traffic distribution and the symmetry of each region, we derive the closed-form formulae of network capacity by determining the maximum traffic load among ISLs. The formulae provide insights into the impact of ISL distribution and the constellation scale. Simulation results validate the theoretical analysis and show that the quasi-torus topology with fewer ISLs can achieve high capacity comparable to the torus-like topology. The theoretical analysis obtained is instrumental to the topology design of mega-constellations.

IEEE Transactions on CommunicationsVol. 73(9)
Xidian University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 95%
Spacecraft Dynamics and Control
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.