Socialising resources: State-encouraged commoning and the making of scarce social goods in Shenzhen (China)

This article critiques the anthropological use of commoning to describe resource-sharing projects or ideals and advocates instead for a focus on socialising resources. While commoning practices involving small, autonomous communities may promote resource conservation and escape capitalist logics, they can also lead to class exclusion. In the Chinese megacity of Shenzhen, community-level cooperative companies exclude migrant outsiders, and state-encouraged commoning initiatives do not generate much solidarity between natives and migrants. Furthermore, the Chinese state’s points-based system for migrant access to public goods reflects a neoliberal logic of competition for scarce resources, creating club goods rather than truly socialised resources – social goods. Anthropologists will provide better-informed critical accounts of issues related to resource distribution if they look beyond the rhetoric of commoning and focus on the scale and degree to which resources are actually socialised.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Critique of Anthropology
Published
2025-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/0308275x251315278
Primary Topic
Rangeland Management and Livestock Ecology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Socialising resources: State-encouraged commoning and the making of scarce social goods in Shenzhen (China)

Anne‐Christine Trémon
Critique of Anthropology
Rangeland Management and Livestock Ecology
article

Socialising resources: State-encouraged commoning and the making of scarce social goods in Shenzhen (China)

Anne‐Christine Trémon
article en

Abstract

This article critiques the anthropological use of commoning to describe resource-sharing projects or ideals and advocates instead for a focus on socialising resources. While commoning practices involving small, autonomous communities may promote resource conservation and escape capitalist logics, they can also lead to class exclusion. In the Chinese megacity of Shenzhen, community-level cooperative companies exclude migrant outsiders, and state-encouraged commoning initiatives do not generate much solidarity between natives and migrants. Furthermore, the Chinese state’s points-based system for migrant access to public goods reflects a neoliberal logic of competition for scarce resources, creating club goods rather than truly socialised resources – social goods. Anthropologists will provide better-informed critical accounts of issues related to resource distribution if they look beyond the rhetoric of commoning and focus on the scale and degree to which resources are actually socialised.

Critique of AnthropologyVol. 45(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 95%
Rangeland Management and Livestock Ecology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.