Towards Just AI: Challenges and Solution Framework for Algorithmic Discrimination in Judicial System

Abstract With the rapid development of technologies like big data, artificial intelligence (herein after AI), and blockchain, society is ushering into a new era of digital civilization. However, the same algorithms that assist in efficient decision-making for human society may also introduce issues of algorithmic discrimination. Therefore, this paper focuses on the judicial domain to deeply explore potential instances of algorithmic discrimination in AI. It identifies three key dimensions of algorithmic discrimination risks in the judicial AI domain: the ambiguity of algorithm usage boundaries, the diversity in discriminatory outcomes, and the injustice within the algorithmic environment. Building upon this, the author examines global AI governance landscapes to extract corresponding governance strategies and practical insights. Finally, a systematic regulatory approach for addressing algorithmic discrimination in judicial AI is proposed, unfolding across three levels and nine aspects: making algorithmic limitations explicit, diversifying algorithmic regulations, and justifying the algorithmic environment. This framework aims to contribute to a more reasonable, systematic, and just governance of algorithms in judicial AI.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Digital Law and Governance
Published
2025-03-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1515/ijdlg-2024-0020
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
7.10
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Towards Just AI: Challenges and Solution Framework for Algorithmic Discrimination in Judicial System

Xiaodong Dou, Lei Dou
3 citations
International Journal of Digital Law and Governance
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
7.10
article

Towards Just AI: Challenges and Solution Framework for Algorithmic Discrimination in Judicial System

Xiaodong Dou, Lei Dou
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Abstract With the rapid development of technologies like big data, artificial intelligence (herein after AI), and blockchain, society is ushering into a new era of digital civilization. However, the same algorithms that assist in efficient decision-making for human society may also introduce issues of algorithmic discrimination. Therefore, this paper focuses on the judicial domain to deeply explore potential instances of algorithmic discrimination in AI. It identifies three key dimensions of algorithmic discrimination risks in the judicial AI domain: the ambiguity of algorithm usage boundaries, the diversity in discriminatory outcomes, and the injustice within the algorithmic environment. Building upon this, the author examines global AI governance landscapes to extract corresponding governance strategies and practical insights. Finally, a systematic regulatory approach for addressing algorithmic discrimination in judicial AI is proposed, unfolding across three levels and nine aspects: making algorithmic limitations explicit, diversifying algorithmic regulations, and justifying the algorithmic environment. This framework aims to contribute to a more reasonable, systematic, and just governance of algorithms in judicial AI.

International Journal of Digital Law and GovernanceVol. 2(1)
Zhejiang University (CN), Renmin University of China (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
7.10
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.