Intersection of biases: In-group positivity for racially diverse ambiguous facial expressions

Emotional expressions offer important social cues about the expresser’s intentions and risks or rewards in the environment. The current study investigated how individual differences in interpretation of ambiguous facial expressions (valence bias) are impacted by intergroup racial biases. In an online study of 409 racially diverse US participants, we found that across racial groups, participants judged in-group faces more positively than out-group faces regardless of expression (happy, angry, or surprised). Furthermore, valence bias generalized from a set of all-White faces to a set of racially diverse faces (Asian, Black, Hispanic, and White). Within the latter task, valence judgments differed as a function of stimulus model race, with more negative judgments of Asian and Black surprised faces. Thus, both individual valence bias and intergroup racial bias influenced emotion judgments, suggesting that these biases intersect in shaping social perceptions and decision-making.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Group Processes & Intergroup Relations
Published
2025-03-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/13684302251320362
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Social and Intergroup Psychology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.20
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Intersection of biases: In-group positivity for racially diverse ambiguous facial expressions

Maital Neta, Jordan E. Pierce, Macey Kristine Grisso
1 citations
Group Processes & Intergroup Relations
Social and Intergroup Psychology
4.20
article

Intersection of biases: In-group positivity for racially diverse ambiguous facial expressions

Maital Neta, Jordan E. Pierce, Macey Kristine Grisso
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Emotional expressions offer important social cues about the expresser’s intentions and risks or rewards in the environment. The current study investigated how individual differences in interpretation of ambiguous facial expressions (valence bias) are impacted by intergroup racial biases. In an online study of 409 racially diverse US participants, we found that across racial groups, participants judged in-group faces more positively than out-group faces regardless of expression (happy, angry, or surprised). Furthermore, valence bias generalized from a set of all-White faces to a set of racially diverse faces (Asian, Black, Hispanic, and White). Within the latter task, valence judgments differed as a function of stimulus model race, with more negative judgments of Asian and Black surprised faces. Thus, both individual valence bias and intergroup racial bias influenced emotion judgments, suggesting that these biases intersect in shaping social perceptions and decision-making.

Group Processes & Intergroup RelationsVol. 28(5)
University of Nebraska–Lincoln (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Social and Intergroup Psychology
4.20
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.