The Right to Stay, Migrate and Return: Conceptualizing Freedom, Examining Diverse National Contexts and Exploring Policy Implications

Executive Summary This paper introduces a special edition of the Journal on Migration and Human Security, which examines a conceptual and interpretive framework called “the right to stay, migrate and return.” The concept builds on what religious leaders and scholars have alternately labelled the “right” or “freedom” to “stay” or to “remain,” and sometimes the right “not to have to emigrate.” This paper analyzes these “rights” in an integrative manner and offers a framework based on human dignity. It argues that the right to stay, migrate and return—as well as variations and combinations of these core options—can successfully frame a broad range of migration contexts, cover every stage of the migration process, guide the development of law and policy, lay the groundwork for effective migration governance, and strengthen humanitarian and development programs. The paper begins by setting forth its understanding of this concept, which seeks to transform often wrenching and coerced decisions—to stay, migrate or return—into voluntary options. Drawing on the 12 papers in this volume, it applies the concept to the diverse, fluid and complex migration contexts of Lebanon, Colombia, Nicaragua, Honduras, El Salvador, the United States and elsewhere. The papers also deploy this concept to analyze state and supranational policies, including the Biden era U.S. “root causes” initiative in Central America, and commitments made by the United States, the European Union, and individual European states to the goals and objectives of the Global Compact on Refugees and the Global Compact for Safe, Orderly and Regular Migration (GCR and GCM, collectively “Global Compacts”). Together, these articles identify conditions, migration polices, state commitments, and humanitarian and development programs that advance or undermine the right to stay, migrate and return. In addition, this paper analyzes support for this concept in international law, U.N. processes and religious teaching. It concludes with policy recommendations and a brief discussion of research needs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal on Migration and Human Security
Published
2025-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/23315024251316473
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Migration and Labor Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
12.60
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Right to Stay, Migrate and Return: Conceptualizing Freedom, Examining Diverse National Contexts and Exploring Policy Implications

Tom Hare, María Fuentes, Donald Kerwin
3 citations
Journal on Migration and Human Security
Migration and Labor Dynamics
12.60
article

The Right to Stay, Migrate and Return: Conceptualizing Freedom, Examining Diverse National Contexts and Exploring Policy Implications

Tom Hare, María Fuentes, Donald Kerwin
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Executive Summary This paper introduces a special edition of the Journal on Migration and Human Security, which examines a conceptual and interpretive framework called “the right to stay, migrate and return.” The concept builds on what religious leaders and scholars have alternately labelled the “right” or “freedom” to “stay” or to “remain,” and sometimes the right “not to have to emigrate.” This paper analyzes these “rights” in an integrative manner and offers a framework based on human dignity. It argues that the right to stay, migrate and return—as well as variations and combinations of these core options—can successfully frame a broad range of migration contexts, cover every stage of the migration process, guide the development of law and policy, lay the groundwork for effective migration governance, and strengthen humanitarian and development programs. The paper begins by setting forth its understanding of this concept, which seeks to transform often wrenching and coerced decisions—to stay, migrate or return—into voluntary options. Drawing on the 12 papers in this volume, it applies the concept to the diverse, fluid and complex migration contexts of Lebanon, Colombia, Nicaragua, Honduras, El Salvador, the United States and elsewhere. The papers also deploy this concept to analyze state and supranational policies, including the Biden era U.S. “root causes” initiative in Central America, and commitments made by the United States, the European Union, and individual European states to the goals and objectives of the Global Compact on Refugees and the Global Compact for Safe, Orderly and Regular Migration (GCR and GCM, collectively “Global Compacts”). Together, these articles identify conditions, migration polices, state commitments, and humanitarian and development programs that advance or undermine the right to stay, migrate and return. In addition, this paper analyzes support for this concept in international law, U.N. processes and religious teaching. It concludes with policy recommendations and a brief discussion of research needs.

Journal on Migration and Human SecurityVol. 13(1)
University of Notre Dame (US), Center for Global Development (US), Association of Jesuit Colleges and Universities (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Migration and Labor Dynamics
12.60
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.