Cosmological constraints on two vacuum decay models

Abstract We constrain two vacuum decay models ( $$\varLambda (t)$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>Λ</mml:mi> <mml:mo>(</mml:mo> <mml:mi>t</mml:mi> <mml:mo>)</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> CDM) utilizing the baryon acoustic oscillations (BAO) data released by the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument (DESI), distance prior from the cosmic microwave background (CMB) observed by the Planck satellite, Hubble rate data obtained via the cosmic chronometers (CC) method and type Ia supernova (SNIa) data. The interaction terms between dark matter and dark energy are defined as $$Q=3\varepsilon H\rho _{\varLambda }$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>Q</mml:mi> <mml:mo>=</mml:mo> <mml:mn>3</mml:mn> <mml:mi>ε</mml:mi> <mml:mi>H</mml:mi> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>ρ</mml:mi> <mml:mi>Λ</mml:mi> </mml:msub> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> for model I and $$3\varepsilon aH\rho _{\varLambda }$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mn>3</mml:mn> <mml:mi>ε</mml:mi> <mml:mi>a</mml:mi> <mml:mi>H</mml:mi> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>ρ</mml:mi> <mml:mi>Λ</mml:mi> </mml:msub> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> for model II. We find that the decay parameter is constrained to be $$\varepsilon =0.0094^{+0.0037}_{-0.0033}$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>ε</mml:mi> <mml:mo>=</mml:mo> <mml:mn>0</mml:mn> <mml:mo>.</mml:mo> <mml:msubsup> <mml:mn>0094</mml:mn> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>-</mml:mo> <mml:mn>0.0033</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>+</mml:mo> <mml:mn>0.0037</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:msubsup> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> for model I and $$\varepsilon =0.0119\pm {0.0045}$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>ε</mml:mi> <mml:mo>=</mml:mo> <mml:mn>0.0119</mml:mn> <mml:mo>±</mml:mo> <mml:mrow> <mml:mn>0.0045</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> for model II, respectively, indicating a potential interaction between dark matter and dark energy at the $$2\sigma $$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mn>2</mml:mn> <mml:mi>σ</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> confidence level. The current Hubble parameter values are estimated to be $$H_{0}=70.30\pm {0.67}$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>H</mml:mi> <mml:mn>0</mml:mn> </mml:msub> <mml:mo>=</mml:mo> <mml:mn>70.30</mml:mn> <mml:mo>±</mml:mo> <mml:mrow> <mml:mn>0.67</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> for model I and $$H_{0}=70.28\pm {0.64}$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>H</mml:mi> <mml:mn>0</mml:mn> </mml:msub> <mml:mo>=</mml:mo> <mml:mn>70.28</mml:mn> <mml:mo>±</mml:mo> <mml:mrow> <mml:mn>0.64</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> for model II. These values of $$H_0$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>H</mml:mi> <mml:mn>0</mml:mn> </mml:msub> </mml:math> fall between those derived from the Planck and SH0ES data, suggesting that these two vacuum decay models could provide a potential solution to alleviate the Hubble tension problem.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The European Physical Journal C
Published
2025-03-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-025-13990-9
Citations
7
Primary Topic
Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.08

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cosmological constraints on two vacuum decay models

X. C. Dai, Yupeng Yang, Yicheng Wang
7 citations
The European Physical Journal C
Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
8.08
article

Cosmological constraints on two vacuum decay models

X. C. Dai, Yupeng Yang, Yicheng Wang
article en
7 citations

Abstract

Abstract We constrain two vacuum decay models ( $$\varLambda (t)$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>Λ</mml:mi> <mml:mo>(</mml:mo> <mml:mi>t</mml:mi> <mml:mo>)</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> CDM) utilizing the baryon acoustic oscillations (BAO) data released by the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument (DESI), distance prior from the cosmic microwave background (CMB) observed by the Planck satellite, Hubble rate data obtained via the cosmic chronometers (CC) method and type Ia supernova (SNIa) data. The interaction terms between dark matter and dark energy are defined as $$Q=3\varepsilon H\rho _{\varLambda }$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>Q</mml:mi> <mml:mo>=</mml:mo> <mml:mn>3</mml:mn> <mml:mi>ε</mml:mi> <mml:mi>H</mml:mi> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>ρ</mml:mi> <mml:mi>Λ</mml:mi> </mml:msub> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> for model I and $$3\varepsilon aH\rho _{\varLambda }$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mn>3</mml:mn> <mml:mi>ε</mml:mi> <mml:mi>a</mml:mi> <mml:mi>H</mml:mi> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>ρ</mml:mi> <mml:mi>Λ</mml:mi> </mml:msub> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> for model II. We find that the decay parameter is constrained to be $$\varepsilon =0.0094^{+0.0037}_{-0.0033}$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>ε</mml:mi> <mml:mo>=</mml:mo> <mml:mn>0</mml:mn> <mml:mo>.</mml:mo> <mml:msubsup> <mml:mn>0094</mml:mn> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>-</mml:mo> <mml:mn>0.0033</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>+</mml:mo> <mml:mn>0.0037</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:msubsup> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> for model I and $$\varepsilon =0.0119\pm {0.0045}$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>ε</mml:mi> <mml:mo>=</mml:mo> <mml:mn>0.0119</mml:mn> <mml:mo>±</mml:mo> <mml:mrow> <mml:mn>0.0045</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> for model II, respectively, indicating a potential interaction between dark matter and dark energy at the $$2\sigma $$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mn>2</mml:mn> <mml:mi>σ</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> confidence level. The current Hubble parameter values are estimated to be $$H_{0}=70.30\pm {0.67}$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>H</mml:mi> <mml:mn>0</mml:mn> </mml:msub> <mml:mo>=</mml:mo> <mml:mn>70.30</mml:mn> <mml:mo>±</mml:mo> <mml:mrow> <mml:mn>0.67</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> for model I and $$H_{0}=70.28\pm {0.64}$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>H</mml:mi> <mml:mn>0</mml:mn> </mml:msub> <mml:mo>=</mml:mo> <mml:mn>70.28</mml:mn> <mml:mo>±</mml:mo> <mml:mrow> <mml:mn>0.64</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> for model II. These values of $$H_0$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>H</mml:mi> <mml:mn>0</mml:mn> </mml:msub> </mml:math> fall between those derived from the Planck and SH0ES data, suggesting that these two vacuum decay models could provide a potential solution to alleviate the Hubble tension problem.

The European Physical Journal CVol. 85(3)
Qufu Normal University (CN)
Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
8.08
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.