Community-based approaches to biodiversity finance

Indigenous peoples and local communities live in, manage, and own large regions and require investment to finance their biodiversity management strategies. Their approaches are proactive and powerful, with clear agency to drive futures that include consistent biodiversity finance. Our literature review and illustrative case studies highlight five factors that influence how communities forge pathways based on their world views and knowledge systems, underpinned by recognition of rights, compensation for damage by colonizers, and establishment of organizations with culturally valid governance to leverage biodiversity finance. Global actors, such as the Parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity implementing the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework, need to understand the history and characteristics of these pathways and tailor their finance to suit — for example, to finance governance and organizational development for some and protected area management for others.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability
Published
2025-03-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2025.101521
Citations
8
Primary Topic
Economic and Environmental Valuation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
25.05
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Community-based approaches to biodiversity finance

Emma Woodward, Rosemary Hill, R. Carter, Kirsten Maclean et al.
8 citations
Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability
Economic and Environmental Valuation
25.05
article

Community-based approaches to biodiversity finance

Emma Woodward, Rosemary Hill, R. Carter, Kirsten Maclean, Whitney Rassip, Edmundo Claro, Diane Jarvis, Phil Rist, Diego O Melgar, Ewamian Limited
article en
8 citations

Abstract

Indigenous peoples and local communities live in, manage, and own large regions and require investment to finance their biodiversity management strategies. Their approaches are proactive and powerful, with clear agency to drive futures that include consistent biodiversity finance. Our literature review and illustrative case studies highlight five factors that influence how communities forge pathways based on their world views and knowledge systems, underpinned by recognition of rights, compensation for damage by colonizers, and establishment of organizations with culturally valid governance to leverage biodiversity finance. Global actors, such as the Parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity implementing the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework, need to understand the history and characteristics of these pathways and tailor their finance to suit — for example, to finance governance and organizational development for some and protected area management for others.

Current Opinion in Environmental SustainabilityVol. 73
Australian National University (AU), Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (AU), Atacama Large Millimeter Submillimeter Array (CL), Australian Institute of Tropical Health and Medicine (AU), Wine Australia (AU), Tharawal Aboriginal (AU), Queensland Department of Environment and Science (AU), Malaysia Theological Seminary (MY), Ecosystem Sciences (AU), James Cook University (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Economic and Environmental Valuation
25.05
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.