Information Sharing and Coordination Between Supply Chains with Bottom-Up Negotiations

Abstract This paper considers competition between two supply chains where one manufacturer has uncertain production costs and can share this private information with its rival. In contrast to existing literature, we study bottom-up negotiations in which dealers make offers to consumers before negotiating with manufacturers, as is common in many industries with complex products, such as interior design, trucks, or luxury cars. Furthermore, we allow for both quality-enhancing and cost-reducing investments and study how these variables affect the incentive to share information and the competitive effects of this conduct. We show that with bottom-up negotiations, information sharing is profitable and procompetitive. In contrast, in the classic model of vertical relations, where the manufacturer makes its choices before the retailer does, exchange of information is unprofitable. We also discuss the implementation of our mechanism by the coordinated setting of list prices.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Competition Law & Economics
Published
2025-01-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/joclec/nhaf005
Primary Topic
Supply Chain and Inventory Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Information Sharing and Coordination Between Supply Chains with Bottom-Up Negotiations

Salvatore Piccolo, Markus Reisinger
Journal of Competition Law & Economics
Supply Chain and Inventory Management
article

Information Sharing and Coordination Between Supply Chains with Bottom-Up Negotiations

Salvatore Piccolo, Markus Reisinger
article en

Abstract

Abstract This paper considers competition between two supply chains where one manufacturer has uncertain production costs and can share this private information with its rival. In contrast to existing literature, we study bottom-up negotiations in which dealers make offers to consumers before negotiating with manufacturers, as is common in many industries with complex products, such as interior design, trucks, or luxury cars. Furthermore, we allow for both quality-enhancing and cost-reducing investments and study how these variables affect the incentive to share information and the competitive effects of this conduct. We show that with bottom-up negotiations, information sharing is profitable and procompetitive. In contrast, in the classic model of vertical relations, where the manufacturer makes its choices before the retailer does, exchange of information is unprofitable. We also discuss the implementation of our mechanism by the coordinated setting of list prices.

Journal of Competition Law & EconomicsVol. 21(3)
Openalex Percentile: Top 94%
Supply Chain and Inventory Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Information Sharing and Coordination Between Supply Chains with Bottom-Up Negotiations — Salvatore Piccolo, Markus Reisinger · Journal of Competition Law & Economics (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS