Packaged delivery of CRISPR–Cas9 ribonucleoproteins accelerates genome editing
Effective genome editing requires a sufficient dose of CRISPR-Cas9 ribonucleoproteins (RNPs) to enter the target cell while minimizing immune responses, off-target editing, and cytotoxicity. Clinical use of Cas9 RNPs currently entails electroporation into cells ex vivo, but no systematic comparison of this method to packaged RNP delivery has been made. Here we compared two delivery strategies, electroporation and enveloped delivery vehicles (EDVs), to investigate the Cas9 dosage requirements for genome editing. Using fluorescence correlation spectroscopy, we determined that >1300 Cas9 RNPs per nucleus are typically required for productive genome editing. EDV-mediated editing was >30-fold more efficient than electroporation, and editing occurs at least 2-fold faster for EDV delivery at comparable total Cas9 RNP doses. We hypothesize that differences in efficacy between these methods result in part from the increased duration of RNP nuclear residence resulting from EDV delivery. Our results directly compare RNP delivery strategies, showing that packaged delivery could dramatically reduce the amount of CRISPR-Cas9 RNPs required for experimental or clinical genome editing.
Authors
- Wayne Ngo (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5755-2303)
- Madeline Zoltek
- Kevin Wasko (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6629-6850)
- Jennifer A. Doudna (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9161-999X)
- Alanna Schepartz (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2127-3932)
- Hannah Karp (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1619-5901)
- Angel Menendez Vazquez (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4550-6454)
- Jinna Brim
Institutions
- QB3 (US)
- Gladstone Institutes (US)
- Howard Hughes Medical Institute (US)
- Innovative Genomics Institute (US)
- Chan Zuckerberg Initiative (United States) (US)
- Palo Alto Institute (US)
- Arc Research Institute
- University of California, Berkeley (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Nucleic Acids Research
- Published
- 2025-02-05
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkaf105
- Citations
- 18
- Primary Topic
- CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 14.51
Funders
- National Science Foundation
- Howard Hughes Medical Institute
- Emerson Collective
- National Institutes of Health
- Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada