Feeding Conflict? New Data on the Impact of Humanitarian Food Aid on Civil Conflict

Abstract Anecdotal and empirical evidence suggests a link between humanitarian food aid and violent conflict, but recent empirical research produced mixed results. This research note reconciles disparate findings by showing that previous measures of humanitarian food aid (1) fail to account for differences in within-country transportation costs and (2) conflate humanitarian and nonhumanitarian food aid. I introduce a new dataset of USAID humanitarian food assistance across 103 countries between 1991 and 2019 which resolves these problems. I exclude shipping costs by using tonnage of food commodities and isolate the humanitarian portions of USAID's food assistance. I find a series of tightly estimated null relationships between humanitarian food aid and the incidence of conflict, conflict termination, and the duration of peace. These results do not change when I use these new data to measure the ease of appropriating humanitarian aid. By introducing new program-level data, this research note provides evidence on a disputed linkage and advances the literature on the unintended consequences of humanitarian assistance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Global Security Studies
Published
2024-12-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/jogss/ogaf002
Primary Topic
International Development and Aid
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Feeding Conflict? New Data on the Impact of Humanitarian Food Aid on Civil Conflict

Matthew K. Ribar
Journal of Global Security Studies
International Development and Aid
article

Feeding Conflict? New Data on the Impact of Humanitarian Food Aid on Civil Conflict

Matthew K. Ribar
article en

Abstract

Abstract Anecdotal and empirical evidence suggests a link between humanitarian food aid and violent conflict, but recent empirical research produced mixed results. This research note reconciles disparate findings by showing that previous measures of humanitarian food aid (1) fail to account for differences in within-country transportation costs and (2) conflate humanitarian and nonhumanitarian food aid. I introduce a new dataset of USAID humanitarian food assistance across 103 countries between 1991 and 2019 which resolves these problems. I exclude shipping costs by using tonnage of food commodities and isolate the humanitarian portions of USAID's food assistance. I find a series of tightly estimated null relationships between humanitarian food aid and the incidence of conflict, conflict termination, and the duration of peace. These results do not change when I use these new data to measure the ease of appropriating humanitarian aid. By introducing new program-level data, this research note provides evidence on a disputed linkage and advances the literature on the unintended consequences of humanitarian assistance.

Journal of Global Security StudiesVol. 10(2)
Stanford University (US)
National Science Foundation
Openalex Percentile: Top 43%
International Development and Aid
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.