Backwards tracing as an exception and beyond

Abstract After the Privy Council decision Federal Republic of Brazil v Durant International Corp [2015] UKPC 35, the question of how the doctrine of backwards tracing should be understood deserves careful consideration. This article seeks to explain that such a doctrine should be understood and categorised as an exception to the traditional tracing principles. Further, it argues that from a wider perspective, this doctrine has far-reaching implications and reveals a deep conflict in the law of trusts. The development of equitable doctrines sometimes appears to be dependent on policy concerns instead of principles. As such, the articulation of the reasons supporting a particular decision is called for.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Trusts & Trustees
Published
2025-02-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/tandt/ttaf003
Primary Topic
Legal principles and applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Backwards tracing as an exception and beyond

Ada Yee Lam Leung, Samuel Yee Ching Leung
Trusts & Trustees
Legal principles and applications
article

Backwards tracing as an exception and beyond

Ada Yee Lam Leung, Samuel Yee Ching Leung
article en

Abstract

Abstract After the Privy Council decision Federal Republic of Brazil v Durant International Corp [2015] UKPC 35, the question of how the doctrine of backwards tracing should be understood deserves careful consideration. This article seeks to explain that such a doctrine should be understood and categorised as an exception to the traditional tracing principles. Further, it argues that from a wider perspective, this doctrine has far-reaching implications and reveals a deep conflict in the law of trusts. The development of equitable doctrines sometimes appears to be dependent on policy concerns instead of principles. As such, the articulation of the reasons supporting a particular decision is called for.

Trusts & TrusteesVol. 31(3)
Chinese University of Hong Kong (HK), University College London (GB)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 94%
Legal principles and applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.