How (and when) does party matter? Explaining MPs’ positions on assisted dying/assisted suicide

Abstract While the legalisation of assisted dying/assisted suicide (AD/AS)1 has enjoyed sustained public support for several decades, Parliament has repeatedly voted decisively against legalisation. This article explores this parliamentary deviation from citizens’ preferences by explaining what shapes MPs’ positions on this free vote issue and, in particular, how (and when) party matters in shaping these positions. It considers both the last Commons vote in 2015 and developments up to July 2024,2 thus avoiding a snapshot analysis of a single moment in time. It finds that while party mattered in the 2015 vote, it was one of many factors that mattered, and was not obviously the most important. However, developments since 2015 suggest that party is likely to play a greater role in the next vote, which is expected in the current parliamentary term.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Parliamentary Affairs
Published
2025-02-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/pa/gsaf002
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Foucault, Power, and Ethics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.40
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How (and when) does party matter? Explaining MPs’ positions on assisted dying/assisted suicide

Ian Bache
2 citations
Parliamentary Affairs
Foucault, Power, and Ethics
8.40
article

How (and when) does party matter? Explaining MPs’ positions on assisted dying/assisted suicide

Ian Bache
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract While the legalisation of assisted dying/assisted suicide (AD/AS)1 has enjoyed sustained public support for several decades, Parliament has repeatedly voted decisively against legalisation. This article explores this parliamentary deviation from citizens’ preferences by explaining what shapes MPs’ positions on this free vote issue and, in particular, how (and when) party matters in shaping these positions. It considers both the last Commons vote in 2015 and developments up to July 2024,2 thus avoiding a snapshot analysis of a single moment in time. It finds that while party mattered in the 2015 vote, it was one of many factors that mattered, and was not obviously the most important. However, developments since 2015 suggest that party is likely to play a greater role in the next vote, which is expected in the current parliamentary term.

Parliamentary AffairsVol. 79(1)
University of Sheffield (GB)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Foucault, Power, and Ethics
8.40
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.