Practical paths towards quantifying and mitigating agricultural methane emissions

This review summarizes the rapid advances in direct practical methods to quantify and reduce agricultural methane emissions worldwide. Major tasks are location, identification, quantification and distinction between different specific sources (often multiple emitters such as manure pools, animal housing, biodigesters and landfills are co-located). Emission reduction, facilitated by developing methodologies for locating hot spots, is the least-cost choice for action, especially from manure stores, biodigesters and from controlling biomass burning. Agricultural methane can also be used to generate electricity or, in appropriate circumstances, can be destroyed by oxidation. It may be possible to cut North American, East Asian and European emissions sharply and rapidly. In Africa and South Asia, emissions from crop waste and food waste in landfills, also a source of air pollution, can be sharply and quickly reduced. Globally, cutting total annual agricultural and waste emissions by a third would demand reductions of very approximately 75 Tg yr −1 . Apportioned by source type, notional cuts might be 30–40 Tg yr −1 from livestock and manure, 5-10 Tg yr −1 from rice cultivation and 20 Tg yr −1 or more from specifically agricultural waste.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences
Published
2025-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.2024.0390
Citations
10
Primary Topic
Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
11.05

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Practical paths towards quantifying and mitigating agricultural methane emissions

David Lowry, Aliah al-Shalan, Charlotte Scheutz, Julianne M. Fernandez et al.
10 citations
Proceedings of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences
Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
11.05
article

Practical paths towards quantifying and mitigating agricultural methane emissions

David Lowry, Aliah al-Shalan, Charlotte Scheutz, Julianne M. Fernandez, James L. France, Semra Bakkaloglu, Martin Manning, Euan G. Nisbet, Rebecca Fisher, Sylvia Michel, Peter B. R. Nisbet-Jones, Thomas Röckmann, Grant Allen, E. J. Dlugokencky, Xin Lan, Charles Brooke, Hugo Denier van der Gon, Sonja Leitner, Ceres A. Woolley Maisch, Lutz Merbold, R. Ellen R. Nisbet
article en
10 citations

Abstract

This review summarizes the rapid advances in direct practical methods to quantify and reduce agricultural methane emissions worldwide. Major tasks are location, identification, quantification and distinction between different specific sources (often multiple emitters such as manure pools, animal housing, biodigesters and landfills are co-located). Emission reduction, facilitated by developing methodologies for locating hot spots, is the least-cost choice for action, especially from manure stores, biodigesters and from controlling biomass burning. Agricultural methane can also be used to generate electricity or, in appropriate circumstances, can be destroyed by oxidation. It may be possible to cut North American, East Asian and European emissions sharply and rapidly. In Africa and South Asia, emissions from crop waste and food waste in landfills, also a source of air pollution, can be sharply and quickly reduced. Globally, cutting total annual agricultural and waste emissions by a third would demand reductions of very approximately 75 Tg yr −1 . Apportioned by source type, notional cuts might be 30–40 Tg yr −1 from livestock and manure, 5-10 Tg yr −1 from rice cultivation and 20 Tg yr −1 or more from specifically agricultural waste.

Proceedings of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering SciencesVol. 481(2309)
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (US), University of Nottingham (GB), Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences (US), Institute of Arctic and Alpine Research (US), Royal Holloway University of London (GB), University of Colorado Boulder (US), Utrecht University (NL), University of Manchester (GB), Victoria University of Wellington (NZ), Agroécologie (FR), Quality Research (US), Agroscope (CH), Imperial College London (GB), International Livestock Research Institute (KE), Technical University of Denmark (DK)
Alborada Trust, Leverhulme Trust, Sight Research UK, European Commission, Natural Environment Research Council
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
11.05
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.