Evaluating Design Variations Using UX-Analyzer

User Experience (UX) is an essential factor in today's business, and so large companies have adopted a process of continuous UX monitoring. In this process, design experts run user tests and analyze UX performance indicators, which are usually obtained from standardized questionnaires performed with users. Thus, this process is expensive, as it requires paying test participants, and allocating the time to manually analyze the collected data. Previously, we have defined interaction effort as a metric for the dynamic performance of web elements, based on measures of the user interaction, and we presented UX-Analyzer as a tool to visualize the interaction effort. UX-Analyzer allows UX experts or other team members to evaluate web pages automatically and in a transparent way. Visualizing the interaction effort may provide a good indication towards the level of UX of an online system. It may also be used in the context of an A/B testing approach that instead of revenue or conversions, it compares the UX of alternative versions of a website. In this paper we show how UX-Analyzer can perform in real settings. We present a case study with 152 participants that show its applicability, and we also add a qualitative study with design professionals to assess its adoption and usefulness. Additionally, we have extended the related work, and describe some new features that improve the tool's flexibility.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ACM SIGAPP Applied Computing Review
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1145/3722097.3722100
Primary Topic
Design Education and Practice
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating Design Variations Using UX-Analyzer

Juan Cruz Gardey, Julián Grigera, Andrés Rodríguez, Alejandra Garrido
ACM SIGAPP Applied Computing Review
Design Education and Practice
article

Evaluating Design Variations Using UX-Analyzer

Juan Cruz Gardey, Julián Grigera, Andrés Rodríguez, Alejandra Garrido
article en

Abstract

User Experience (UX) is an essential factor in today's business, and so large companies have adopted a process of continuous UX monitoring. In this process, design experts run user tests and analyze UX performance indicators, which are usually obtained from standardized questionnaires performed with users. Thus, this process is expensive, as it requires paying test participants, and allocating the time to manually analyze the collected data. Previously, we have defined interaction effort as a metric for the dynamic performance of web elements, based on measures of the user interaction, and we presented UX-Analyzer as a tool to visualize the interaction effort. UX-Analyzer allows UX experts or other team members to evaluate web pages automatically and in a transparent way. Visualizing the interaction effort may provide a good indication towards the level of UX of an online system. It may also be used in the context of an A/B testing approach that instead of revenue or conversions, it compares the UX of alternative versions of a website. In this paper we show how UX-Analyzer can perform in real settings. We present a case study with 152 participants that show its applicability, and we also add a qualitative study with design professionals to assess its adoption and usefulness. Additionally, we have extended the related work, and describe some new features that improve the tool's flexibility.

ACM SIGAPP Applied Computing ReviewVol. 24(4)
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (AR), Universidad Nacional de La Plata (AR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Design Education and Practice
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Evaluating Design Variations Using UX-Analyzer — Juan Cruz Gardey, Julián Grigera, et al. · ACM SIGAPP Applied Computing Review (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS