The Wagner Group and its relationship with the Russian state

Abstract This article builds on existing literature on privatization of security to create a framework for increasing our understanding of contemporary private military companies' (PMCs) relations to states. By adding country-specific characteristics about government structures and market–state relations to the concept of enmeshment, the concept is developed so that it extends beyond the focus on ‘public’ and ‘private’ in relation to the neo-liberal market for force, and encompasses neo-patrimonial formal and informal systems of governance. This is illustrated by the empirical example of the Wagner Group and its enmeshment with the Russian state. Applying the concept of regime enmeshment shows that the group and its relationship with the Russian state, despite some obvious differences from earlier PMCs, is not a completely new phenomenon but can be understood as a continuation of existing practices of outsourcing security, which is adapted to the Russian context. Furthermore, this article argues that enmeshed actors in the formal and informal regime actively negotiate their position with reference to legitimizing factors, and that Yevgeny Prigozhin, the financier of the Wagner Group, could be seen as a loyalist entrepreneur taking part in an elite competition of patriotism to achieve legitimacy and status.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Affairs
Published
2025-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/ia/iiae324
Primary Topic
Defense, Military, and Policy Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Wagner Group and its relationship with the Russian state

Karen Philippa Larsen
International Affairs
Defense, Military, and Policy Studies
article

The Wagner Group and its relationship with the Russian state

Karen Philippa Larsen
article en

Abstract

Abstract This article builds on existing literature on privatization of security to create a framework for increasing our understanding of contemporary private military companies' (PMCs) relations to states. By adding country-specific characteristics about government structures and market–state relations to the concept of enmeshment, the concept is developed so that it extends beyond the focus on ‘public’ and ‘private’ in relation to the neo-liberal market for force, and encompasses neo-patrimonial formal and informal systems of governance. This is illustrated by the empirical example of the Wagner Group and its enmeshment with the Russian state. Applying the concept of regime enmeshment shows that the group and its relationship with the Russian state, despite some obvious differences from earlier PMCs, is not a completely new phenomenon but can be understood as a continuation of existing practices of outsourcing security, which is adapted to the Russian context. Furthermore, this article argues that enmeshed actors in the formal and informal regime actively negotiate their position with reference to legitimizing factors, and that Yevgeny Prigozhin, the financier of the Wagner Group, could be seen as a loyalist entrepreneur taking part in an elite competition of patriotism to achieve legitimacy and status.

International AffairsVol. 101(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 94%
Defense, Military, and Policy Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.