A comprehensive comparative study on SAPO-34 and ZSM-5 catalyst for the conversion of ethanol-to-light olefins

Abstract This study aims to compare the catalytic performance of ZSM-5 and SAPO-34 zeolite catalysts in the conversion of ethanol. Through experiments conducted at different temperatures (773 and 673 K), it was found that SAPO-34 initially exhibits superior propylene selectivity compared to ZSM-5. However, the propylene yield on SAPO-34 gradually decreases, while the ethylene yield increases with time on stream. Density functional theory calculations were employed for the investigation of the reaction mechanism. The results indicate that the SAPO-34 catalyst surface favors propylene desorption, which is beneficial for its initial high propylene selectivity. Nevertheless, the smaller pore structure of SAPO-34 limits the effective diffusion of products, leading to product accumulation within the pores and potentially causing catalyst coking and deactivation. By combining the experimental results with theoretical calculations, this study not only explored the selectivity difference between SAPO-34 and H-ZSM-5 in ethanol conversion reaction but also revealed the influence of different molecular sieve catalyst structures on product distribution and catalyst stability.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Clean Energy
Published
2025-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/ce/zkaf007
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Zeolite Catalysis and Synthesis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.07
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A comprehensive comparative study on SAPO-34 and ZSM-5 catalyst for the conversion of ethanol-to-light olefins

Baowang Lu, Mingyuan Dong, Xinrui Wang, Yanli Zhang et al.
2 citations
Clean Energy
Zeolite Catalysis and Synthesis
1.07
article

A comprehensive comparative study on SAPO-34 and ZSM-5 catalyst for the conversion of ethanol-to-light olefins

Baowang Lu, Mingyuan Dong, Xinrui Wang, Yanli Zhang, Dong Liu, Kun Chen, Wei Xia, Zhenhua Jiang
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract This study aims to compare the catalytic performance of ZSM-5 and SAPO-34 zeolite catalysts in the conversion of ethanol. Through experiments conducted at different temperatures (773 and 673 K), it was found that SAPO-34 initially exhibits superior propylene selectivity compared to ZSM-5. However, the propylene yield on SAPO-34 gradually decreases, while the ethylene yield increases with time on stream. Density functional theory calculations were employed for the investigation of the reaction mechanism. The results indicate that the SAPO-34 catalyst surface favors propylene desorption, which is beneficial for its initial high propylene selectivity. Nevertheless, the smaller pore structure of SAPO-34 limits the effective diffusion of products, leading to product accumulation within the pores and potentially causing catalyst coking and deactivation. By combining the experimental results with theoretical calculations, this study not only explored the selectivity difference between SAPO-34 and H-ZSM-5 in ethanol conversion reaction but also revealed the influence of different molecular sieve catalyst structures on product distribution and catalyst stability.

Clean EnergyVol. 9(3)
National Institute of Clean and Low-Carbon Energy (CN), China University of Petroleum, East China (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
Zeolite Catalysis and Synthesis
1.07
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A comprehensive comparative study on SAPO-34 and ZSM-5 catalyst for the conversion of ethanol-to-light olefins — Baowang Lu, Mingyuan Dong, et al. · Clean Energy (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS