The analyses of structural covariance and structural covariance similarity of cortical morphological measures

Structural covariance refers to the concurrent changes in one morphological measure between two brain regions. Structural covariance of cortical morphological measures such as cortical thickness (CT), surface area (SA), and cortical volume (CV) have been applied to identify brain structural differences between patients with neuropsychiatric disorders and healthy controls. However, the precise relationships between structural covariance patterns of different cortical measures remain largely unknown. Here, we optimized the preprocessing and calculation approaches of structural covariances and investigated both global (whole-brain-level) and regional (brain-region-level) structural covariance similarities between CT, SA, and CV in 35,580 individuals. We found that Pearson correlation outperformed partial correlation due to generating fewer negative correlations of uncertain biological significance and principal component regression outperformed the regressions of total intracranial volume and respective global measures in removing global effects and reducing negative correlations. We observed that both global and regional covariance similarities of SA-CV were much higher than those of CT-CV and CT-SA, although they were influenced by the selection of atlases and covariance values. We also found age and sex effects on structural covariances and age effects on covariance similarities. The higher SA-CV covariance similarities than CT-CV indicates that SA contributes more to CV covariance than CT, although CV is derived from both CT and SA. The lack of CT-SA covariance similarities suggests that CT and SA have different covariance patterns and should be used in combination in structural covariance studies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
NeuroImage
Published
2025-03-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2025.121118
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.86
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The analyses of structural covariance and structural covariance similarity of cortical morphological measures

Ailin Hou, Yanmin Peng, Meng Liang, Xi Zhang et al.
2 citations
NeuroImage
Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
2.86
article

The analyses of structural covariance and structural covariance similarity of cortical morphological measures

Ailin Hou, Yanmin Peng, Meng Liang, Xi Zhang, Chunshui Yu, Dongyue Li
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Structural covariance refers to the concurrent changes in one morphological measure between two brain regions. Structural covariance of cortical morphological measures such as cortical thickness (CT), surface area (SA), and cortical volume (CV) have been applied to identify brain structural differences between patients with neuropsychiatric disorders and healthy controls. However, the precise relationships between structural covariance patterns of different cortical measures remain largely unknown. Here, we optimized the preprocessing and calculation approaches of structural covariances and investigated both global (whole-brain-level) and regional (brain-region-level) structural covariance similarities between CT, SA, and CV in 35,580 individuals. We found that Pearson correlation outperformed partial correlation due to generating fewer negative correlations of uncertain biological significance and principal component regression outperformed the regressions of total intracranial volume and respective global measures in removing global effects and reducing negative correlations. We observed that both global and regional covariance similarities of SA-CV were much higher than those of CT-CV and CT-SA, although they were influenced by the selection of atlases and covariance values. We also found age and sex effects on structural covariances and age effects on covariance similarities. The higher SA-CV covariance similarities than CT-CV indicates that SA contributes more to CV covariance than CT, although CV is derived from both CT and SA. The lack of CT-SA covariance similarities suggests that CT and SA have different covariance patterns and should be used in combination in structural covariance studies.

NeuroImageVol. 310
Tianjin Medical University General Hospital (CN), Tianjin Medical University (CN)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
2.86
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.