‘Miracle Drugs’ versus State Bureaucracy and Regulations: The Introduction of Sulpha Drugs and Antibiotics in Chile, 1930s–1950s

Summary This article deals with the impact of the early introduction of sulpha drugs and antibiotics in Chile before mass production. Sulphonamides were swiftly introduced in the late 1930s since they were cheap and widely available. Mortality rates for infectious diseases that could be treated with sulpha drugs declined quickly. However, the equivalent impact of penicillin and other antibiotics on reducing mortality for other infectious diseases took longer to develop. There were many barriers to the widespread provision of antibiotics in Chile: antibiotics remained expensive; international supply was insufficient; the country did not have any significant level of own production; imports were further limited given the country’s prohibition of some imports, the lack of foreign currency to finance imports, and strong regulation of internal commercialisation. Only the construction of a WHO plant for penicillin solved the shortage of antibiotics and markedly reduced mortality rates.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Social History of Medicine
Published
2025-03-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/shm/hkaf005
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Historical Medical Research and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.36

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

‘Miracle Drugs’ versus State Bureaucracy and Regulations: The Introduction of Sulpha Drugs and Antibiotics in Chile, 1930s–1950s

Bernardo González, Manuel Llorca‐Jaña
1 citations
Social History of Medicine
Historical Medical Research and Treatments
1.36
article

‘Miracle Drugs’ versus State Bureaucracy and Regulations: The Introduction of Sulpha Drugs and Antibiotics in Chile, 1930s–1950s

Bernardo González, Manuel Llorca‐Jaña
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Summary This article deals with the impact of the early introduction of sulpha drugs and antibiotics in Chile before mass production. Sulphonamides were swiftly introduced in the late 1930s since they were cheap and widely available. Mortality rates for infectious diseases that could be treated with sulpha drugs declined quickly. However, the equivalent impact of penicillin and other antibiotics on reducing mortality for other infectious diseases took longer to develop. There were many barriers to the widespread provision of antibiotics in Chile: antibiotics remained expensive; international supply was insufficient; the country did not have any significant level of own production; imports were further limited given the country’s prohibition of some imports, the lack of foreign currency to finance imports, and strong regulation of internal commercialisation. Only the construction of a WHO plant for penicillin solved the shortage of antibiotics and markedly reduced mortality rates.

Social History of MedicineVol. 38(3)
Adolfo Ibáñez University (CL)
Agencia Nacional de Investigación y Desarrollo
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Historical Medical Research and Treatments
1.36
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

‘Miracle Drugs’ versus State Bureaucracy and Regulations: The Introduction of Sulpha Drugs and Antibiotics in Chile, 1930s–1950s — Bernardo González, Manuel Llorca‐Jaña · Social History of Medicine (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS