“Stop the steal”: misinformation correction and misperceptions about election fraud

Purpose The two primary purposes of the current study are to further understand the impact of corrective messages on misperceptions about election fraud in the US and to test the effect of party affiliation of the accused politician on participants’ election misperceptions. Design/methodology/approach To assess these relationships, we conducted a between-subjects randomized online experiment. Findings Our results show that participants in the control condition held higher misperceptions than those who were exposed to a correction message. Findings also showed that liberal media use was negatively associated with election fraud misperceptions, while conservative media use, information from Donald Trump, authoritarianism and self-reported conservatives were positively associated with election fraud misperceptions. Originality/value Experimental test to understand election fraud misperceptions, using our own original stimulus materials.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Online Information Review
Published
2025-03-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/oir-08-2024-0512
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Misinformation and Its Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
16.81
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

“Stop the steal”: misinformation correction and misperceptions about election fraud

Pablo González-González, Porismita Borah, Homero Gil de Zúñiga
4 citations
Online Information Review
Misinformation and Its Impacts
16.81
article

“Stop the steal”: misinformation correction and misperceptions about election fraud

Pablo González-González, Porismita Borah, Homero Gil de Zúñiga
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Purpose The two primary purposes of the current study are to further understand the impact of corrective messages on misperceptions about election fraud in the US and to test the effect of party affiliation of the accused politician on participants’ election misperceptions. Design/methodology/approach To assess these relationships, we conducted a between-subjects randomized online experiment. Findings Our results show that participants in the control condition held higher misperceptions than those who were exposed to a correction message. Findings also showed that liberal media use was negatively associated with election fraud misperceptions, while conservative media use, information from Donald Trump, authoritarianism and self-reported conservatives were positively associated with election fraud misperceptions. Originality/value Experimental test to understand election fraud misperceptions, using our own original stimulus materials.

Online Information ReviewVol. 49(5)
Pennsylvania State University (US), Washington State University Vancouver (US), Universidad de Salamanca (ES), Washington State University (US), Universidad Diego Portales (CL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Misinformation and Its Impacts
16.81
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.