‘To Listen to Both Sides Equally’: Just Judgment in the Athenian Courts

Classical Athens is often celebrated as a model of deliberative democracy and a reminder of the value of talking with others. The historical Athens, however, complicates this picture. In certain political contexts, the Athenians did not think that talking with others would serve justice or democratic equality and they prohibited verbal deliberation among jurors in the popular courts ( dikasteria ). In this article, I explain why they did so. I argue that the jurors’ oath’s injunction to ‘listen to both sides equally’ is at the heart of the Athenian conception of just judicial judgment, and I show how Athenians sought to generate unbiased, democratic and egalitarian judgment during trials without relying on a notion of impartiality that requires dispassion or disinterestedness.

Publication Details

Journal
History of Political Thought
Published
2025-02-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.53765/20512988.46.1.1
Primary Topic
Classical Antiquity Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

‘To Listen to Both Sides Equally’: Just Judgment in the Athenian Courts

History of Political Thought
Classical Antiquity Studies
article

‘To Listen to Both Sides Equally’: Just Judgment in the Athenian Courts

article en

Abstract

Classical Athens is often celebrated as a model of deliberative democracy and a reminder of the value of talking with others. The historical Athens, however, complicates this picture. In certain political contexts, the Athenians did not think that talking with others would serve justice or democratic equality and they prohibited verbal deliberation among jurors in the popular courts ( dikasteria ). In this article, I explain why they did so. I argue that the jurors’ oath’s injunction to ‘listen to both sides equally’ is at the heart of the Athenian conception of just judicial judgment, and I show how Athenians sought to generate unbiased, democratic and egalitarian judgment during trials without relying on a notion of impartiality that requires dispassion or disinterestedness.

History of Political ThoughtVol. 46(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 95%
Classical Antiquity Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.