The Revolt of the <i>Ciompi</i> in Niccolò Machiavelli’s <i>Florentine Histories</i> and the Mixed Constitution

Based on a reading of the Florentine Histories 3, 1???18 and the Discursus florentinarum rerum , I argue that although Machiavelli is sympathetic to the ciompi revolt of 1378, we should not conclude that the author prefers a ‘popular’ or ‘democratic’ state. His understanding of the social and political conditions under which the ciompi lived and the fact that, through the speech of one of their leaders, he grants them the right to speak publicly, are, in my view, indications that he prefers a ‘mixed’ polity, in which they should participate along with the powerful ( grandi ) rather than a proof of his ‘democratic’ leanings. I also argue that Machiavelli’s preference for the ‘mixed’ polity does not appear only in his later texts, but is consistent with the famous analysis of the Roman constitution in the first chapters of the Discourses on the first ten books of Titus Livius .

Publication Details

Journal
History of Political Thought
Published
2025-02-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.53765/20512988.46.1.60
Primary Topic
Renaissance and Early Modern Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Revolt of the Ciompi in Niccolò Machiavelli’s Florentine Histories and the Mixed Constitution

History of Political Thought
Renaissance and Early Modern Studies
article

The Revolt of the Ciompi in Niccolò Machiavelli’s Florentine Histories and the Mixed Constitution

article en

Abstract

Based on a reading of the Florentine Histories 3, 1???18 and the Discursus florentinarum rerum , I argue that although Machiavelli is sympathetic to the ciompi revolt of 1378, we should not conclude that the author prefers a ‘popular’ or ‘democratic’ state. His understanding of the social and political conditions under which the ciompi lived and the fact that, through the speech of one of their leaders, he grants them the right to speak publicly, are, in my view, indications that he prefers a ‘mixed’ polity, in which they should participate along with the powerful ( grandi ) rather than a proof of his ‘democratic’ leanings. I also argue that Machiavelli’s preference for the ‘mixed’ polity does not appear only in his later texts, but is consistent with the famous analysis of the Roman constitution in the first chapters of the Discourses on the first ten books of Titus Livius .

History of Political ThoughtVol. 46(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 96%
Renaissance and Early Modern Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.