‘I Love you Whom the World calls Enemies’: Mary Astell Against Political Friendship

Both champions and critics of political friendship in contemporary political theory draw exclusively on canonical, male figures such as Aristotle, Cicero, Machiavelli or Hobbes. Resisting this tendency, this article recovers the critique of political friendship we find in Mary Astell, the seventeenth-century philosopher and pamphleteer known as ‘the first English feminist’. Astell, like Aristotle, argued for a thick conception of friendship which relied on virtue. Unlike Aristotle, however, Astell rejected a thinner kind of political friendship, one which did not require virtue. This article proposes that we should see Astell as providing a defence of the usefulness of political enmity . After true and virtuous friends, enemies were best at fulfilling the end of friendship – to point out one’s flaws and improve one’s virtue. Astell’s critique of political friendship and her appreciation of enmity is especially relevant for contemporary proponents of civic friendship and scholars who argue for partisanship as a form of friendship.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
History of Political Thought
Published
2025-02-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.53765/20512988.46.1.79
Primary Topic
American Constitutional Law and Politics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

‘I Love you Whom the World calls Enemies’: Mary Astell Against Political Friendship

Geertje J. Bol
History of Political Thought
American Constitutional Law and Politics
article

‘I Love you Whom the World calls Enemies’: Mary Astell Against Political Friendship

Geertje J. Bol
article en

Abstract

Both champions and critics of political friendship in contemporary political theory draw exclusively on canonical, male figures such as Aristotle, Cicero, Machiavelli or Hobbes. Resisting this tendency, this article recovers the critique of political friendship we find in Mary Astell, the seventeenth-century philosopher and pamphleteer known as ‘the first English feminist’. Astell, like Aristotle, argued for a thick conception of friendship which relied on virtue. Unlike Aristotle, however, Astell rejected a thinner kind of political friendship, one which did not require virtue. This article proposes that we should see Astell as providing a defence of the usefulness of political enmity . After true and virtuous friends, enemies were best at fulfilling the end of friendship – to point out one’s flaws and improve one’s virtue. Astell’s critique of political friendship and her appreciation of enmity is especially relevant for contemporary proponents of civic friendship and scholars who argue for partisanship as a form of friendship.

History of Political ThoughtVol. 46(1)
Ghent University (BE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 96%
American Constitutional Law and Politics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

‘I Love you Whom the World calls Enemies’: Mary Astell Against Political Friendship — Geertje J. Bol · History of Political Thought (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS