A comparative study of multiple physical assessment indicators to identify psychological symptoms: a cross-sectional study based on Chinese adolescents

This study found that neither the ABSI nor the BRI was superior to BMI, WC, or WHtR in predicting psychological symptoms in Chinese adolescents. The ABSI was the least predictive of psychological symptoms in Chinese adolescents, whereas the BRI showed potential as a surrogate for WC and WHtR indicators for assessing psychological symptoms. This study provides additional help and suggestions for better identification of psychological symptoms in Chinese adolescents.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Nutrition
Published
2025-03-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2025.1511639
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Eating Disorders and Behaviors
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.92
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A comparative study of multiple physical assessment indicators to identify psychological symptoms: a cross-sectional study based on Chinese adolescents

Yan Liu, Jun Li, Feng Zhang, Yun Niu et al.
3 citations
Frontiers in Nutrition
Eating Disorders and Behaviors
6.92
article

A comparative study of multiple physical assessment indicators to identify psychological symptoms: a cross-sectional study based on Chinese adolescents

Yan Liu, Jun Li, Feng Zhang, Yun Niu, Cunjian Bi, Guangyan Yang, Xiaokang Ran
article en
3 citations

Abstract

This study found that neither the ABSI nor the BRI was superior to BMI, WC, or WHtR in predicting psychological symptoms in Chinese adolescents. The ABSI was the least predictive of psychological symptoms in Chinese adolescents, whereas the BRI showed potential as a surrogate for WC and WHtR indicators for assessing psychological symptoms. This study provides additional help and suggestions for better identification of psychological symptoms in Chinese adolescents.

Frontiers in NutritionVol. 12
Chizhou University (CN), East China Normal University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Eating Disorders and Behaviors
6.92
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.