The Effect of the Practice of Donning and Doffing Level D Personal Protective Equipment Using Augmented Reality on Nursing Students: A Mixed Method Research
Purpose: This study investigated the effect of practice of donning and doffing level D personal protective equipment (PPE) based on augmented reality (AR) on the knowledge and performance confidence, practical immersion, practical satisfaction, and practical experience of nursing students.Methods: This mixed-method study included 28 participants in the experimental group and 28 in the control group in C city. The intervention in the experimental group was practice of donning and doffing level D PPE based on AR and the control group received video-based training. Quantitative data were analyzed using the IBM SPSS program, and qualitative data were subjected to content analysis.Results: There were significant differences in performance confidence (t=3.17, <i>p</i>=.002) and practice satisfaction (z=-2.13, <i>p</i>=.033), but not in knowledge (z=-0.90, <i>p</i>=.366) and practice immersion (t=1.71, <i>p</i>=.093) regarding PPE. In the experience of nursing students who participated in AR-based practice, the facilitating factors were “good concentration in practice,” “can use the technology accurately,” “the skills remain in memory for a long time,” and “the practice was interesting and fun.” The obstacles to AR-based practice were “using smart glasses to watch AR content was uncomfortable” and “it was difficult to adapt to AR-based content.”Conclusion: Based on the results of this study, we suggest applying AR-based practice in practical education to increase nursing students' performance confidence and practice satisfaction.
Authors
- Mi Yang Jeon (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5058-9912)
- Seung Hee Heo
Publication Details
- Journal
- Journal of Korean Academy of Fundamentals of Nursing
- Published
- 2025-02-28
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.7739/jkafn.2025.32.1.1
- Citations
- 4
- Primary Topic
- Healthcare Education and Workforce Issues
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 15.46