Comparison of Domestic and Foreign Standards and Fire Case Analysis for Identifying Major Risk Factors in Petrochemical Plants

Petrochemical plants are industrial facilities with a high risk of accidents, including fires, explosions, and gas leaks, which can result in the loss of life and property, environmental pollution, and a decline in social credibility. This study analyzed domestic and international fire safety standards (e.g., the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA), American Petroleum Institute (API), and Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA)) and fire case studies to identify shortcomings in the safety management systems of petrochemical plants in Korea and determine major risk factors. The Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) technique was employed to calculate weights based on fatalities, injuries, and property damage, enabling a quantitative evaluation of the relative importance of key risk factors. The analysis identified inadequate management, maintenance, and repair practices owing to insufficient manpower and aging equipment as primary risk factors. Furthermore, Korea's safety management system was found to be insufficient compared with international standards. This study serves as a foundation for enhancing fire safety through data-driven risk factor analysis and prevention system development in the future.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Fire Science and Engineering
Published
2025-02-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7731/kifse.3cf91381
Primary Topic
Risk and Safety Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of Domestic and Foreign Standards and Fire Case Analysis for Identifying Major Risk Factors in Petrochemical Plants

Han-Bit Choi, Doo-Chan Choi, Sanggyun Oh
Fire Science and Engineering
Risk and Safety Analysis
article

Comparison of Domestic and Foreign Standards and Fire Case Analysis for Identifying Major Risk Factors in Petrochemical Plants

Han-Bit Choi, Doo-Chan Choi, Sanggyun Oh
article en

Abstract

Petrochemical plants are industrial facilities with a high risk of accidents, including fires, explosions, and gas leaks, which can result in the loss of life and property, environmental pollution, and a decline in social credibility. This study analyzed domestic and international fire safety standards (e.g., the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA), American Petroleum Institute (API), and Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA)) and fire case studies to identify shortcomings in the safety management systems of petrochemical plants in Korea and determine major risk factors. The Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) technique was employed to calculate weights based on fatalities, injuries, and property damage, enabling a quantitative evaluation of the relative importance of key risk factors. The analysis identified inadequate management, maintenance, and repair practices owing to insufficient manpower and aging equipment as primary risk factors. Furthermore, Korea's safety management system was found to be insufficient compared with international standards. This study serves as a foundation for enhancing fire safety through data-driven risk factor analysis and prevention system development in the future.

Fire Science and EngineeringVol. 39(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 96%
Risk and Safety Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Comparison of Domestic and Foreign Standards and Fire Case Analysis for Identifying Major Risk Factors in Petrochemical Plants — Han-Bit Choi, Doo-Chan Choi, et al. · Fire Science and Engineering (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS