Direct-guided punction percutaneous nephrolitothomy versus standard percutaneous nephrolitothomy

Introduction . Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is considered the gold standard for treating renal stones larger than 2 centimetres. The initial stage of PCNL involves retrograde catheterisation of the pelvicalyceal system (PCS) with contrast enhancement. Direct-guided puncture is a modification of standard PCNL, where puncture of the PCS is performed without retrograde enhancement of the PCS. Objective. To compare the efficacy and safety of standard PCNL (miniPCNL/mPCNL) versus direct-guided puncture PCNL (dgPCNL). Materials & methods . The study involved 67 patients who were recruited between September 2021 and March 2023. They were divided into two groups. Group 1 (n = 35) underwent standard PCNL, while group 2 (n = 32) received dgPCNL. We compared the following parameters: surgery duration and puncture time, visualization (using the Likert scale), stone-free rate (SFR), blood loss (post-op haemoglobin level decrease), renal function (post-op creatinine variations), and postoperative complications. To assess SFR, patients underwent abdominal computed tomography (CT) on the first post-op day. Postoperative complications were assessed using the Clavien-Dindo classification. Results . The average surgery time in group 2 was 16 minutes, which was significantly less than that in group 1 (p < 0.001). We believe this reduction is due to the absence of the first stage. The puncture time did not differ between the two groups (p = 0.739), with an average puncture time of 2 minutes. There was no significant difference in SFR between the groups, with 91.4% in group 1 and 93.8% in group 2 (p > 0.999). Similarly, there were no significant differences in haemoglobin loss and creatinine changes between the groups (p = 0.32 and p = 0.442, respectively). No severe complications were observed, as classified by Clavien-Dindo III and IV. Conclusion . dgPCNL is safe and effective compared to standard PCNL, offering the advantage of reduced operative time. Blood transfusions were not required in either group.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Urology Herald
Published
2025-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21886/2308-6424-2025-13-1-5-12
Primary Topic
Kidney Stones and Urolithiasis Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Direct-guided punction percutaneous nephrolitothomy versus standard percutaneous nephrolitothomy

Farzona I Tursunova, E V Shpot, G.N. Akopyan, Petr Glybochko et al.
Urology Herald
Kidney Stones and Urolithiasis Treatments
article

Direct-guided punction percutaneous nephrolitothomy versus standard percutaneous nephrolitothomy

Farzona I Tursunova, E V Shpot, G.N. Akopyan, Petr Glybochko, Nariman K. Gadzhiev, D. V. Chinenov, T.P. Fedortsova, K. M. Yusupov, H. H. Davronbekov, I. I. Tursunov
article en

Abstract

Introduction . Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is considered the gold standard for treating renal stones larger than 2 centimetres. The initial stage of PCNL involves retrograde catheterisation of the pelvicalyceal system (PCS) with contrast enhancement. Direct-guided puncture is a modification of standard PCNL, where puncture of the PCS is performed without retrograde enhancement of the PCS. Objective. To compare the efficacy and safety of standard PCNL (miniPCNL/mPCNL) versus direct-guided puncture PCNL (dgPCNL). Materials & methods . The study involved 67 patients who were recruited between September 2021 and March 2023. They were divided into two groups. Group 1 (n = 35) underwent standard PCNL, while group 2 (n = 32) received dgPCNL. We compared the following parameters: surgery duration and puncture time, visualization (using the Likert scale), stone-free rate (SFR), blood loss (post-op haemoglobin level decrease), renal function (post-op creatinine variations), and postoperative complications. To assess SFR, patients underwent abdominal computed tomography (CT) on the first post-op day. Postoperative complications were assessed using the Clavien-Dindo classification. Results . The average surgery time in group 2 was 16 minutes, which was significantly less than that in group 1 (p < 0.001). We believe this reduction is due to the absence of the first stage. The puncture time did not differ between the two groups (p = 0.739), with an average puncture time of 2 minutes. There was no significant difference in SFR between the groups, with 91.4% in group 1 and 93.8% in group 2 (p > 0.999). Similarly, there were no significant differences in haemoglobin loss and creatinine changes between the groups (p = 0.32 and p = 0.442, respectively). No severe complications were observed, as classified by Clavien-Dindo III and IV. Conclusion . dgPCNL is safe and effective compared to standard PCNL, offering the advantage of reduced operative time. Blood transfusions were not required in either group.

Urology HeraldVol. 13(1)
Sechenov University (RU), Medical Technologies (Czechia) (CZ)
Openalex Percentile: Top 94%
Kidney Stones and Urolithiasis Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.