Daiktavardžio neapykanta ir su juo semantiškai susijusių žodžių valentingumas dabartinėje lietuvių kalboje

Using methods of interpretation, descriptive analysis, grammatical analysis, semantic and lexical analysis, 657 sentences containing different forms of the noun neapykanta drawn from the Corpus of Contemporary Lithuanian Language were analysed. The research showed that the syntactic valency of the noun neapykanta differs significantly from that of the verb nekęsti. Specifically, the nominative and genitive cases governed by the verb nekęsti are replaced by the genitive and dative cases governed by the noun neapykanta.The findings indicate that the valency of neapykanta is influenced by the semantics and grammar of nouns within its minimal semantic field. For example, neapykanta, like priešiškumas, nemeilė, and netolerancija, requires a genitive and/or dative actant. Similar to priešiškumas and netolerancija, neapykanta can take a construction with atžvilgiu instead of the dative, and, like nemeilė and netolerancija, it can govern the genitive. Furthermore, like the verb nekęsti, neapykanta can govern a subordinate clause and a prepositional phrase with dėl. It can also, like priešiškumas and netolerancija, co-occur with an adjective that indicates the cause of hatred or construction with dėl, similar to the verb nekęsti. Additionally, neapykanta, like priešiškumas, nemeilė, and netolerancija, can emphasize the fact that sometimes the feeling is mutual. This is expressed by reciprocal anaphora (vienas kitam), constructions such as tarp + genitive or genitive and genitive, and adjectives abipusė, savitarpio, (genitive) tarpusavio.When the noun neapykanta is in agreement with a dative beneficient, it expresses an emotional relationship between two beings. However, it describes a person᾽s attitude towards an object or a concept, neapykanta agrees with the dative contentive. When a hateful person is mentioned or emphasized in a sentence, the noun neapykanta agrees with the genitive percipient. Hence, the noun neapykanta has the same semantic valency as the verb nekęsti and other nouns within its minimal semantic field.As is known, the verb nekęsti requires an agent, which can be either a person or a living thing. However, the collected examples of neapykanta show that the feeling of hatred is unique to humans (just like nemeilė and netolerancija). Nonetheless, hatred can be directed towards anything: people, animate and inanimate objects, or abstracts concepts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Taikomoji kalbotyra
Published
2024-12-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.15388/taikalbot.2024.21.10
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Lexicography and Language Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.56
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Daiktavardžio neapykanta ir su juo semantiškai susijusių žodžių valentingumas dabartinėje lietuvių kalboje

Veslava Čižik-Prokaševa
2 citations
Taikomoji kalbotyra
Lexicography and Language Studies
5.56
article

Daiktavardžio neapykanta ir su juo semantiškai susijusių žodžių valentingumas dabartinėje lietuvių kalboje

Veslava Čižik-Prokaševa
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Using methods of interpretation, descriptive analysis, grammatical analysis, semantic and lexical analysis, 657 sentences containing different forms of the noun neapykanta drawn from the Corpus of Contemporary Lithuanian Language were analysed. The research showed that the syntactic valency of the noun neapykanta differs significantly from that of the verb nekęsti. Specifically, the nominative and genitive cases governed by the verb nekęsti are replaced by the genitive and dative cases governed by the noun neapykanta.The findings indicate that the valency of neapykanta is influenced by the semantics and grammar of nouns within its minimal semantic field. For example, neapykanta, like priešiškumas, nemeilė, and netolerancija, requires a genitive and/or dative actant. Similar to priešiškumas and netolerancija, neapykanta can take a construction with atžvilgiu instead of the dative, and, like nemeilė and netolerancija, it can govern the genitive. Furthermore, like the verb nekęsti, neapykanta can govern a subordinate clause and a prepositional phrase with dėl. It can also, like priešiškumas and netolerancija, co-occur with an adjective that indicates the cause of hatred or construction with dėl, similar to the verb nekęsti. Additionally, neapykanta, like priešiškumas, nemeilė, and netolerancija, can emphasize the fact that sometimes the feeling is mutual. This is expressed by reciprocal anaphora (vienas kitam), constructions such as tarp + genitive or genitive and genitive, and adjectives abipusė, savitarpio, (genitive) tarpusavio.When the noun neapykanta is in agreement with a dative beneficient, it expresses an emotional relationship between two beings. However, it describes a person᾽s attitude towards an object or a concept, neapykanta agrees with the dative contentive. When a hateful person is mentioned or emphasized in a sentence, the noun neapykanta agrees with the genitive percipient. Hence, the noun neapykanta has the same semantic valency as the verb nekęsti and other nouns within its minimal semantic field.As is known, the verb nekęsti requires an agent, which can be either a person or a living thing. However, the collected examples of neapykanta show that the feeling of hatred is unique to humans (just like nemeilė and netolerancija). Nonetheless, hatred can be directed towards anything: people, animate and inanimate objects, or abstracts concepts.

Taikomoji kalbotyra(21)
Institute of the Lithuanian Language (LT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Lexicography and Language Studies
5.56
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.