Comparing machine learning classifier models in discriminating cognitively unimpaired older adults from three clinical cohorts in the Alzheimer’s disease spectrum: demonstration analyses in the COMPASS-ND study

The ML results indicate that two tree-based methods (RF and GB) are reliable and effective as initial models for classification tasks involving discrete clinical aging and neurodegeneration data. In the XAI phase, SHAP performed better than LIME due to lower computational time (when applied to RF and GB) and incorporation of feature interactions, leading to more reliable results.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
Published
2025-03-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2025.1542514
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.47
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparing machine learning classifier models in discriminating cognitively unimpaired older adults from three clinical cohorts in the Alzheimer’s disease spectrum: demonstration analyses in the COMPASS-ND study

Harrison Fah, Russell Greiner, Linzy Bohn, Roger A. Dixon
1 citations
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
1.47
article

Comparing machine learning classifier models in discriminating cognitively unimpaired older adults from three clinical cohorts in the Alzheimer’s disease spectrum: demonstration analyses in the COMPASS-ND study

Harrison Fah, Russell Greiner, Linzy Bohn, Roger A. Dixon
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The ML results indicate that two tree-based methods (RF and GB) are reliable and effective as initial models for classification tasks involving discrete clinical aging and neurodegeneration data. In the XAI phase, SHAP performed better than LIME due to lower computational time (when applied to RF and GB) and incorporation of feature interactions, leading to more reliable results.

Frontiers in Aging NeuroscienceVol. 17
University of Alberta (CA), Women and Children’s Health Research Institute (CA)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
1.47
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.