Research on the ecological–economic effects of combined planting–breeding modes: a case study of Zizania latifolia–shelduck in China

In the context of global climate change, it is crucial to adopt ecologically sound production practices to promote sustainable agricultural development. Combined rice–fish, rice–crab, and Zizania latifolia (ZL)–shelduck modes are increasingly advocated by scholars because of the complex farmland landscapes and environmentally friendly nutrient cycles associated with these modes. In this study, a comprehensive evaluation of the ecological–economic benefits of a combined planting–breeding system in Jinyun, Zhejiang, China, was conducted via life cycle assessment (LCA) and cost–benefit analysis on the basis of literature review and field research data. The following results were obtained. (1) The single-season total carbon footprint for the combined ZL–shelduck planting–breeding mode was 4062.19 kg CO 2 eq/ha, whereas it was 4553.32 kg CO 2 eq/ha for the ZL monoculture mode. Compared with those of the ZL monoculture mode, the carbon emissions of the combined ZL–shelduck mode decreased by 10.79%, with agricultural inputs identified as the primary source of carbon emissions for both modes. (2) The net ecological and economic benefits of the combined planting–breeding mode and the monoculture mode were 102,482.26 yuan/ha and 70,423.60 yuan/ha, respectively. Compared with those of the ZL monoculture mode, the net benefits significantly increased by 45.52% in the combined planting–breeding mode. Notably, the sale of shelduck products and reductions in agricultural inputs and labor costs were important factors leading to the income gap between the two types of modes. This study not only provides a quantitative evaluation of the comprehensive ecological–economic benefits of different agricultural production modes but also serves as an important reference for the introduction of relevant ecological compensation policies and the promotion of production and ecological win–win in the future.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems
Published
2025-03-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2025.1481149
Primary Topic
Agricultural Systems and Practices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Research on the ecological–economic effects of combined planting–breeding modes: a case study of Zizania latifolia–shelduck in China

Moucheng Liu, Teng Wang, Zhidong Li, Lidan Xu et al.
Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems
Agricultural Systems and Practices
article

Research on the ecological–economic effects of combined planting–breeding modes: a case study of Zizania latifolia–shelduck in China

Moucheng Liu, Teng Wang, Zhidong Li, Lidan Xu, Qi Wan, D. SAI GANGADHARA RAO
article en

Abstract

In the context of global climate change, it is crucial to adopt ecologically sound production practices to promote sustainable agricultural development. Combined rice–fish, rice–crab, and Zizania latifolia (ZL)–shelduck modes are increasingly advocated by scholars because of the complex farmland landscapes and environmentally friendly nutrient cycles associated with these modes. In this study, a comprehensive evaluation of the ecological–economic benefits of a combined planting–breeding system in Jinyun, Zhejiang, China, was conducted via life cycle assessment (LCA) and cost–benefit analysis on the basis of literature review and field research data. The following results were obtained. (1) The single-season total carbon footprint for the combined ZL–shelduck planting–breeding mode was 4062.19 kg CO 2 eq/ha, whereas it was 4553.32 kg CO 2 eq/ha for the ZL monoculture mode. Compared with those of the ZL monoculture mode, the carbon emissions of the combined ZL–shelduck mode decreased by 10.79%, with agricultural inputs identified as the primary source of carbon emissions for both modes. (2) The net ecological and economic benefits of the combined planting–breeding mode and the monoculture mode were 102,482.26 yuan/ha and 70,423.60 yuan/ha, respectively. Compared with those of the ZL monoculture mode, the net benefits significantly increased by 45.52% in the combined planting–breeding mode. Notably, the sale of shelduck products and reductions in agricultural inputs and labor costs were important factors leading to the income gap between the two types of modes. This study not only provides a quantitative evaluation of the comprehensive ecological–economic benefits of different agricultural production modes but also serves as an important reference for the introduction of relevant ecological compensation policies and the promotion of production and ecological win–win in the future.

Frontiers in Sustainable Food SystemsVol. 9
Chinese Academy of Tropical Agricultural Sciences (CN), Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN), Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Openalex Percentile: Top 96%
Agricultural Systems and Practices
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.