Should I stay or go? Valuation of multiple premium payment options for participating life insurance contracts

Abstract Participating life insurance contracts with investment guarantees typically possess various embedded options. In this paper, we focus on common options with early exercise features, i.e., paid-up options, resumption options, surrender options and the combinations among them. The valuation of these options depends strongly on the exercise strategy applied by the policyholder. We extend the Least Square Monte Carlo (LSMC) method to approximate an optimal exercise strategy and to determine multiple optimal exercise points while incorporating two stochastic sources (asset and interest rate risk). In addition, these findings are compared to results based on two other exercise assumptions. In contrast to earlier studies on this topic, we show in our model setup that premium-payment options can pose a severe risk for life insurers if not priced properly and hence are of great value for policyholders if used strategically. Moreover, we demonstrate that introducing fees for exercising premium-payment options only slightly reduces the option price necessary to finance adequate risk management measures.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Review of Managerial Science
Published
2025-03-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-025-00841-w
Primary Topic
Insurance, Mortality, Demography, Risk Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Should I stay or go? Valuation of multiple premium payment options for participating life insurance contracts

Hsiaoyin Chang, Hato Schmeiser
Review of Managerial Science
Insurance, Mortality, Demography, Risk Management
article

Should I stay or go? Valuation of multiple premium payment options for participating life insurance contracts

Hsiaoyin Chang, Hato Schmeiser
article en

Abstract

Abstract Participating life insurance contracts with investment guarantees typically possess various embedded options. In this paper, we focus on common options with early exercise features, i.e., paid-up options, resumption options, surrender options and the combinations among them. The valuation of these options depends strongly on the exercise strategy applied by the policyholder. We extend the Least Square Monte Carlo (LSMC) method to approximate an optimal exercise strategy and to determine multiple optimal exercise points while incorporating two stochastic sources (asset and interest rate risk). In addition, these findings are compared to results based on two other exercise assumptions. In contrast to earlier studies on this topic, we show in our model setup that premium-payment options can pose a severe risk for life insurers if not priced properly and hence are of great value for policyholders if used strategically. Moreover, we demonstrate that introducing fees for exercising premium-payment options only slightly reduces the option price necessary to finance adequate risk management measures.

Review of Managerial ScienceVol. 19(10)
University of St.Gallen (CH)
Universität St. Gallen
Openalex Percentile: Top 94%
Insurance, Mortality, Demography, Risk Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Should I stay or go? Valuation of multiple premium payment options for participating life insurance contracts — Hsiaoyin Chang, Hato Schmeiser · Review of Managerial Science (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS