The Post-9/11 United States’ Shift Strategy in Afghanistan: An Explanation in the Perspective of Offensive -Defensive Realism and Offshore Strategy

After the terrorist attacks on September 11, 2001, President George W. Bush attacked Afghanistan in the name of War on Terror. He intended not only to topple the Taliban government but also to extend diplomatic, economic and military support to anti-Taliban forces in Afghanistan. Offensive realism was the driving force behind the US strategy to achieve its objectives in its war against terror in Afghanistan. But strategic guerilla war by the Taliban fighters and rise of China especially after 2008 have made it very difficult for the US defense policymakers to continue the offensive approach in Afghanistan. Thus, the US strategy of relentless security competition and power struggle, as imagined by the offensive realism, is finally unsuccessful and unconvincing after prolonged Afghan war. As a result, the US had to change its strategy in Afghanistan based on defensive realism and offshore balance and decided to tackle it with the war-cum-peace strategies from defensive realists’ perspective.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Social Sciences Spectrum
Published
2025-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.71085/sss.04.01.230
Primary Topic
International Relations and Foreign Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Post-9/11 United States’ Shift Strategy in Afghanistan: An Explanation in the Perspective of Offensive -Defensive Realism and Offshore Strategy

Niaz Makhdum Muhammad, Syed Fakharuddin Shah
Social Sciences Spectrum
International Relations and Foreign Policy
article

The Post-9/11 United States’ Shift Strategy in Afghanistan: An Explanation in the Perspective of Offensive -Defensive Realism and Offshore Strategy

Niaz Makhdum Muhammad, Syed Fakharuddin Shah
article en

Abstract

After the terrorist attacks on September 11, 2001, President George W. Bush attacked Afghanistan in the name of War on Terror. He intended not only to topple the Taliban government but also to extend diplomatic, economic and military support to anti-Taliban forces in Afghanistan. Offensive realism was the driving force behind the US strategy to achieve its objectives in its war against terror in Afghanistan. But strategic guerilla war by the Taliban fighters and rise of China especially after 2008 have made it very difficult for the US defense policymakers to continue the offensive approach in Afghanistan. Thus, the US strategy of relentless security competition and power struggle, as imagined by the offensive realism, is finally unsuccessful and unconvincing after prolonged Afghan war. As a result, the US had to change its strategy in Afghanistan based on defensive realism and offshore balance and decided to tackle it with the war-cum-peace strategies from defensive realists’ perspective.

Social Sciences SpectrumVol. 4(1)
Government of Pakistan (PK), National Defence University (PK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 96%
International Relations and Foreign Policy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.