Comparison of Single Port Laparoscopic Ingulinal Hernia Repair versus Open Herniotomy in Term of Recurrence and Postoperative Scrotal Hematoma

Hernia repair is common surgical procedures, with techniques evolving to improve outcomes. Comparing laparoscopic and open approaches is crucial for determining the optimal method to reduce complications such as recurrence and postoperative scrotal hematoma. Objective: To compare the frequency of hematoma and recurrence in laparoscopic assisted inguinal hernian repair versus open herniotomy. Methods: This quasi experimental study was conducted after approval from CPSP (Ref No: CPSP/REU/PSG-2017-068-339, REU 37362) at Pediatric Surgery Department Services Hospital, Lahore, from October 2020 to March 2021 on 254 patients. Patients were divided into two equal groups; Group-A (single port needle assisted laparoscopic repair) and Group-B, (open repair). Patients were assessed after 24 hours to see scrotal hematoma and regular follow up for 3 months to see the recurrence. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 26.0. Independent sample t-test and chi square was applied to compare quantitative and qualitative variables between groups; p-value ≤0.05 as significant. Results: Postoperative hematoma formation was found among 2 patients (1.6%) of Group-A and in 13 patients (10.2%) of Group-B, (p=0.003). Postoperative recurrence between two groups was comparable and statistically insignificant (Group A 6.3% vs Group B 4.0%, p=0.393). (p=0.393). Conclusions: In conclusion, laparoscopic-assisted hernia repair and open herniotomy demonstrate comparable recurrence rates. However, laparoscopic-assisted repair is associated with a significantly lower incidence of postoperative hematoma. These findings indicate that laparoscopic repair may be a safer option with fewer postoperative complications, making it a favorable choice for pediatric inguinal hernia surgery.