Energy transitions at remote mines: The implications of transitioning to low-carbon electricity generation for Indigenous rights in northern Canada

• Across Canada and internationally, mining companies are exploring options to transition away from fossil fuel-based electricity generation at remote mine sites. • In northern Canada, Indigenous organizations and communities are supportive of the mining industry's efforts to transition to low-carbon electricity generation, so long as energy transitions do not come at the expense of their Indigenous rights. • Thus far, Nunavut Inuit have been successful in using the territory's co-management institutions to stop unwanted proposals for electricity generation that pose unacceptable risks to Indigenous harvesting rights. • However, their ability to stop unwanted electricity generation moving forward is far from clear. This article contributes to scholarly literature about energy transitions, extraction, and social justice with case studies of proposed low-carbon electricity generation for remote mines in Nunavut, Canada. It considers the implications of energy transitions at remote mines for the Indigenous rights of Inuit and Dene. On the one hand, low-carbon electricity generation can disturb wildlife habitat, negatively affecting the ability of Inuit and Dene to exercise their rights to harvest wildlife. On the other hand, Indigenous community and institutional opposition to some forms of low-carbon electricity generation raises questions about the ability of Indigenous peoples to provide or withhold their consent to land uses that may negatively affect their rights. In some cases, compromises between Indigenous communities and extractive industries will be possible. Compromise solutions are more likely to emerge when proponents and regulators consider ecological and Indigenous values when siting energy infrastructure, avoid siting infrastructure in critical wildlife habitat, consult Indigenous communities regarding the type of low carbon electricity generation, and agree to conservative and precautionary measures to mitigate the effects of electricity generation on wildlife.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Extractive Industries and Society
Published
2025-03-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exis.2025.101636
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Mining and Resource Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.01
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Energy transitions at remote mines: The implications of transitioning to low-carbon electricity generation for Indigenous rights in northern Canada

Warren Bernauer
1 citations
The Extractive Industries and Society
Mining and Resource Management
1.01
article

Energy transitions at remote mines: The implications of transitioning to low-carbon electricity generation for Indigenous rights in northern Canada

Warren Bernauer
article en
1 citations

Abstract

• Across Canada and internationally, mining companies are exploring options to transition away from fossil fuel-based electricity generation at remote mine sites. • In northern Canada, Indigenous organizations and communities are supportive of the mining industry's efforts to transition to low-carbon electricity generation, so long as energy transitions do not come at the expense of their Indigenous rights. • Thus far, Nunavut Inuit have been successful in using the territory's co-management institutions to stop unwanted proposals for electricity generation that pose unacceptable risks to Indigenous harvesting rights. • However, their ability to stop unwanted electricity generation moving forward is far from clear. This article contributes to scholarly literature about energy transitions, extraction, and social justice with case studies of proposed low-carbon electricity generation for remote mines in Nunavut, Canada. It considers the implications of energy transitions at remote mines for the Indigenous rights of Inuit and Dene. On the one hand, low-carbon electricity generation can disturb wildlife habitat, negatively affecting the ability of Inuit and Dene to exercise their rights to harvest wildlife. On the other hand, Indigenous community and institutional opposition to some forms of low-carbon electricity generation raises questions about the ability of Indigenous peoples to provide or withhold their consent to land uses that may negatively affect their rights. In some cases, compromises between Indigenous communities and extractive industries will be possible. Compromise solutions are more likely to emerge when proponents and regulators consider ecological and Indigenous values when siting energy infrastructure, avoid siting infrastructure in critical wildlife habitat, consult Indigenous communities regarding the type of low carbon electricity generation, and agree to conservative and precautionary measures to mitigate the effects of electricity generation on wildlife.

The Extractive Industries and SocietyVol. 23
University of Manitoba (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 27%
Mining and Resource Management
1.01
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Energy transitions at remote mines: The implications of transitioning to low-carbon electricity generation for Indigenous rights in northern Canada — Warren Bernauer · The Extractive Industries and Society (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS