Trends in the Racial and Ethnic Classification of Mixed‐Heritage Children in the United States, 2000–2022

ABSTRACT Objectives This article examines trends in how parents of mixed White and non‐White—Black, American Indian or Alaska Native, Asian or Pacific Islander, Latinx, and Middle Eastern or North African—heritage report the heritage of their children on government surveys and whether parents’ classification of their children varies by major sociodemographic characteristics. Methods Using 2000–2022 American Community Survey (ACS) data, a first analysis focuses on first‐generation biracial children, whose parents report being of two different monoracial categories. A second analysis includes a broader population with variation in the generational timing of mixed heritage and in whether parents indicate their mixed heritage in response to ACS race or ancestry questions. Results Parents became more likely throughout the period, by up to 20–30 percentage points for some groups, to report their children's heritage as mixed, while both White‐only and non‐White‐only classification declined. Parents who report mixed heritage for their children are more socioeconomically advantaged, by income and education, than those who choose a single‐heritage label. Conclusions Among parents with the same mixed heritage, preferences about how to classify their children have substantially shifted in a multiracial direction. This shift accentuates underlying growth in the population of multiracial children.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Social Science Quarterly
Published
2025-02-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.70006
Primary Topic
Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Trends in the Racial and Ethnic Classification of Mixed‐Heritage Children in the United States, 2000–2022

Christel Kesler
Social Science Quarterly
Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
article

Trends in the Racial and Ethnic Classification of Mixed‐Heritage Children in the United States, 2000–2022

Christel Kesler
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Objectives This article examines trends in how parents of mixed White and non‐White—Black, American Indian or Alaska Native, Asian or Pacific Islander, Latinx, and Middle Eastern or North African—heritage report the heritage of their children on government surveys and whether parents’ classification of their children varies by major sociodemographic characteristics. Methods Using 2000–2022 American Community Survey (ACS) data, a first analysis focuses on first‐generation biracial children, whose parents report being of two different monoracial categories. A second analysis includes a broader population with variation in the generational timing of mixed heritage and in whether parents indicate their mixed heritage in response to ACS race or ancestry questions. Results Parents became more likely throughout the period, by up to 20–30 percentage points for some groups, to report their children's heritage as mixed, while both White‐only and non‐White‐only classification declined. Parents who report mixed heritage for their children are more socioeconomically advantaged, by income and education, than those who choose a single‐heritage label. Conclusions Among parents with the same mixed heritage, preferences about how to classify their children have substantially shifted in a multiracial direction. This shift accentuates underlying growth in the population of multiracial children.

Social Science QuarterlyVol. 106(2)
Colby College (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 95%
Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.