Does Cutting Child Benefits Reduce Fertility in Larger Families? Evidence from the UK’s Two-Child Limit

Abstract We study the fertility effects of restricting child-related social assistance to the first two children in the family. As of 2017, all third and subsequent children born on or after 6 April 2017 in the UK were made ineligible for approximately 3000 GBP of means-tested child benefits per year. Using a triple difference and regression discontinuity design, we leverage administrative births microdata to identify the impact of the two-child limit on higher-order births. We find little to no decline in higher-order fertility among low-income families, with our estimates indicating at most small elasticities relative to the literature.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Population Research and Policy Review
Published
2025-03-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11113-025-09935-5
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Family Dynamics and Relationships
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
11.18

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Does Cutting Child Benefits Reduce Fertility in Larger Families? Evidence from the UK’s Two-Child Limit

Ruth Patrick, Mary Reader, Jonathan Portes
2 citations
Population Research and Policy Review
Family Dynamics and Relationships
11.18
article

Does Cutting Child Benefits Reduce Fertility in Larger Families? Evidence from the UK’s Two-Child Limit

Ruth Patrick, Mary Reader, Jonathan Portes
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract We study the fertility effects of restricting child-related social assistance to the first two children in the family. As of 2017, all third and subsequent children born on or after 6 April 2017 in the UK were made ineligible for approximately 3000 GBP of means-tested child benefits per year. Using a triple difference and regression discontinuity design, we leverage administrative births microdata to identify the impact of the two-child limit on higher-order births. We find little to no decline in higher-order fertility among low-income families, with our estimates indicating at most small elasticities relative to the literature.

Population Research and Policy ReviewVol. 44(2)
King's College London (GB), University of York (GB), London School of Economics and Political Science (GB), Stanford University (US)
Nuffield Foundation
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Family Dynamics and Relationships
11.18
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Does Cutting Child Benefits Reduce Fertility in Larger Families? Evidence from the UK’s Two-Child Limit — Ruth Patrick, Mary Reader, et al. · Population Research and Policy Review (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS