Screening cotton cultivars for low-phosphorus tolerance: a comparison of hydroponic and field methods

Abstract Background Soil available phosphorus (AP) deficiency significantly limits cotton production, particularly in arid and saline-alkaline regions. Screening cotton cultivars for low phosphorus (P) tolerance is crucial for the sustainable development of cotton production. However, the effect of different growth media on the screening outcomes remains unclear. To address this, we evaluated the low P tolerance of 25 cotton cultivars through hydroponic culture at two P levels (0.01 and 0.5 mmol•L −1 KH 2 PO 4 ) in 2018 and field culture with two P rates (0 and 90 kg•hm −2 , in P 2 O 5 ) in 2019. Results In the hydroponic experiments, principal component analysis (PCA) showed that shoot dry weight (SDW) and P utilization efficiency in shoots (PUES) of cotton seedlings explained over 45% of the genetic variation in P nutrition. Cotton cultivars were subjected to comprehensive cluster analysis, utilizing agronomic traits (SDW and PUES) during the seedling stage (hydroponic) and yield and fiber quality traits during the mature stage (in field). These cultivars were grouped into four clusters: resistant, moderately resistant, moderately sensitive, and sensitive. In low P conditions (0.01 mmol•L −1 KH 2 PO 4 and 4.5 mg•kg −1 AP), the low-P-resistant cluster showed significantly smaller reductions in SDW (54%), seed cotton yield (3%), lint yield (− 2%), fiber length (− 1%), and fiber strength (− 3%) compared with the low-P-sensitive cluster (75%, 13%, 17%, 7%, and 9%, respectively). The increase in PUES (299%) in the resistant cluster was also significantly higher than in the sensitive cluster (131%). Four of the eight low-P-tolerant cotton cultivars identified in the field and six in the hydroponic screening overlapped in both screenings. Two cultivars overlapped in both screening in the low-P-sensitive cluster. Conclusion Based on the screenings from both field and hydroponic cultures, ZM-9131, CCRI-79, JM-958, and J-228 were identified as low-P-tolerant cotton cultivars, while JM-169, XM-33B, SCRC-28, and LNM-18 were identified as low-P-sensitive cotton cultivars. The relationship between field and hydroponic screening results for low-P-tolerant cotton cultivars was strong, although field validation is still required. The low P tolerance of these cultivars was closely associated with SDW and PUES.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Cotton Research
Published
2025-03-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s42397-025-00212-6
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Plant nutrient uptake and metabolism
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.75

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Screening cotton cultivars for low-phosphorus tolerance: a comparison of hydroponic and field methods

Cangsong Zheng, Jingjing Shao, Huimin Han, Feichao Huo et al.
1 citations
Journal of Cotton Research
Plant nutrient uptake and metabolism
1.75
article

Screening cotton cultivars for low-phosphorus tolerance: a comparison of hydroponic and field methods

Cangsong Zheng, Jingjing Shao, Huimin Han, Feichao Huo, Weina Feng, Pengcheng Li, Helin Dong, Miao Sun
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Background Soil available phosphorus (AP) deficiency significantly limits cotton production, particularly in arid and saline-alkaline regions. Screening cotton cultivars for low phosphorus (P) tolerance is crucial for the sustainable development of cotton production. However, the effect of different growth media on the screening outcomes remains unclear. To address this, we evaluated the low P tolerance of 25 cotton cultivars through hydroponic culture at two P levels (0.01 and 0.5 mmol•L −1 KH 2 PO 4 ) in 2018 and field culture with two P rates (0 and 90 kg•hm −2 , in P 2 O 5 ) in 2019. Results In the hydroponic experiments, principal component analysis (PCA) showed that shoot dry weight (SDW) and P utilization efficiency in shoots (PUES) of cotton seedlings explained over 45% of the genetic variation in P nutrition. Cotton cultivars were subjected to comprehensive cluster analysis, utilizing agronomic traits (SDW and PUES) during the seedling stage (hydroponic) and yield and fiber quality traits during the mature stage (in field). These cultivars were grouped into four clusters: resistant, moderately resistant, moderately sensitive, and sensitive. In low P conditions (0.01 mmol•L −1 KH 2 PO 4 and 4.5 mg•kg −1 AP), the low-P-resistant cluster showed significantly smaller reductions in SDW (54%), seed cotton yield (3%), lint yield (− 2%), fiber length (− 1%), and fiber strength (− 3%) compared with the low-P-sensitive cluster (75%, 13%, 17%, 7%, and 9%, respectively). The increase in PUES (299%) in the resistant cluster was also significantly higher than in the sensitive cluster (131%). Four of the eight low-P-tolerant cotton cultivars identified in the field and six in the hydroponic screening overlapped in both screenings. Two cultivars overlapped in both screening in the low-P-sensitive cluster. Conclusion Based on the screenings from both field and hydroponic cultures, ZM-9131, CCRI-79, JM-958, and J-228 were identified as low-P-tolerant cotton cultivars, while JM-169, XM-33B, SCRC-28, and LNM-18 were identified as low-P-sensitive cotton cultivars. The relationship between field and hydroponic screening results for low-P-tolerant cotton cultivars was strong, although field validation is still required. The low P tolerance of these cultivars was closely associated with SDW and PUES.

Journal of Cotton ResearchVol. 8(1)
Natural Science Foundation of Xinjiang Province, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Natural Science Foundation of Xinjiang, National Key Research and Development Program of China, Agricultural Science and Technology Innovation Program
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Plant nutrient uptake and metabolism
1.75
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.