The Rise of the First-Generation College Student: A Ubiquitous Category in Need of Critical Analysis

In US higher education, the category ‘first-generation college student’ has become ubiquitous. Students without parents who graduated from college are categorized as such, programs are designed for them, and researchers study them. Used as a proxy for socioeconomic status, this category offers a way for colleges and universities to acknowledge vast resource differences among students while evading direct discussion of social class itself. Research on first-generation college students often positions the category as the starting point of the analysis, measuring, for example, gaps in academic performance between first-generation and continuing-generation students. Here, I call for the first-generation college student category itself to be positioned as the object of critical analysis. I draw on the critical tradition in the sociology of education to reveal the category’s ideological dimensions. Specifically, I argue that the first-generation college student category reflects and supports two pillars of neoliberalism in higher education: meritocracy and diversity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Critical Sociology
Published
2025-03-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/08969205241309904
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Parental Involvement in Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
17.85
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Rise of the First-Generation College Student: A Ubiquitous Category in Need of Critical Analysis

Tina Wildhagen
2 citations
Critical Sociology
Parental Involvement in Education
17.85
article

The Rise of the First-Generation College Student: A Ubiquitous Category in Need of Critical Analysis

Tina Wildhagen
article en
2 citations

Abstract

In US higher education, the category ‘first-generation college student’ has become ubiquitous. Students without parents who graduated from college are categorized as such, programs are designed for them, and researchers study them. Used as a proxy for socioeconomic status, this category offers a way for colleges and universities to acknowledge vast resource differences among students while evading direct discussion of social class itself. Research on first-generation college students often positions the category as the starting point of the analysis, measuring, for example, gaps in academic performance between first-generation and continuing-generation students. Here, I call for the first-generation college student category itself to be positioned as the object of critical analysis. I draw on the critical tradition in the sociology of education to reveal the category’s ideological dimensions. Specifically, I argue that the first-generation college student category reflects and supports two pillars of neoliberalism in higher education: meritocracy and diversity.

Critical SociologyVol. 52(2)
Smith College (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Parental Involvement in Education
17.85
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The Rise of the First-Generation College Student: A Ubiquitous Category in Need of Critical Analysis — Tina Wildhagen · Critical Sociology (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS