Co-Production Phases in the Development and Implementation of Digital Public Services

ABSTRACT Public bureaucracies can be digitally transformed by using co-production approaches to design and develop digital public services with input from their stakeholders. Drawing on interviews with international digital transformation experts, this article explores what co-production looks like—conceptually and empirically. We are making a theoretical contribution to the existing co-production literature by identifying the roles different stakeholders play in each co-production phase and the work practices and approaches used to incorporate the stakeholders’ viewpoints. We show that service users’ input is not included continuously but selectively in the co-production phases of digital public services. Although digital public services are co-designed initially with the input of potential service users in the form of their user needs, the subsequent phases include different stakeholders up until the use phase, where service users are simultaneously using and evaluating the service. The results from this empirical study on the co-production of digital public services expand the existing co-production models—the co-production eco-system of stakeholders must be enlarged by the range of actors that need to be involved and the diverse roles they play in addressing citizen needs in a prospective, concurrent, and retrospective manner.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Perspectives on Public Management and Governance
Published
2025-02-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/ppmgov/gvaf002
Citations
4
Primary Topic
E-Government and Public Services
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
34.09
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Co-Production Phases in the Development and Implementation of Digital Public Services

Nathalie Haug, Ines Mergel, Noella Edelmann
4 citations
Perspectives on Public Management and Governance
E-Government and Public Services
34.09
article

Co-Production Phases in the Development and Implementation of Digital Public Services

Nathalie Haug, Ines Mergel, Noella Edelmann
article en
4 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT Public bureaucracies can be digitally transformed by using co-production approaches to design and develop digital public services with input from their stakeholders. Drawing on interviews with international digital transformation experts, this article explores what co-production looks like—conceptually and empirically. We are making a theoretical contribution to the existing co-production literature by identifying the roles different stakeholders play in each co-production phase and the work practices and approaches used to incorporate the stakeholders’ viewpoints. We show that service users’ input is not included continuously but selectively in the co-production phases of digital public services. Although digital public services are co-designed initially with the input of potential service users in the form of their user needs, the subsequent phases include different stakeholders up until the use phase, where service users are simultaneously using and evaluating the service. The results from this empirical study on the co-production of digital public services expand the existing co-production models—the co-production eco-system of stakeholders must be enlarged by the range of actors that need to be involved and the diverse roles they play in addressing citizen needs in a prospective, concurrent, and retrospective manner.

Perspectives on Public Management and GovernanceVol. 8(2)
Universität für Weiterbildung Krems (AT), University of Konstanz (DE), Fraunhofer Institute for Open Communication Systems (DE), University of Vaasa (FI)
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
E-Government and Public Services
34.09
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.