Global 21 cm signal recovery under changing environmental conditions
ABSTRACT The redshifted 21 cm line of cosmic atomic hydrogen is one of the most auspicious tools in deciphering the early Universe. Recovering this signal remains an ongoing problem for cosmologists in the field, with the signal being hidden behind foregrounds approximately five orders of magnitude brighter than itself. A traditional forward modelling data analysis pipeline using Bayesian data analysis and a physically motivated foreground model to find this signal shows great promise in the case of unchanging environmental conditions. However, we demonstrate in this paper that in the presence of a soil with changing dielectric properties under the antenna over time, or a changing soil temperature in the far field of our observation, these traditional methods struggle. In this paper, we detail a tool using Masked Auto-regressive Flows that improves upon previous physically motivated foreground models when one is trying to recover this signal in the presence of changing environmental conditions. We demonstrate that with these changing parameters, our tool consistently recovers the signal with a much greater Bayesian evidence than the traditional data analysis pipeline, decreasing the root mean square error in the recovery of the injected signal by up to 45 per cent.
Authors
- Eloy de Lera Acedo (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8530-6989)
- John Cumner (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8479-3746)
- Dominic Anstey (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1742-7417)
- H. T. J. Bevins (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4367-3550)
- Jean Cavillot (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5731-1721)
- Joe H. N. Pattison (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0006-9440-7355)
Institutions
- Institute of Astronomy (RU)
- UCLouvain (BE)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
- Published
- 2025-02-26
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/staf315
- Citations
- 4
- Primary Topic
- Soil Moisture and Remote Sensing
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 3.20