Interoperability for ecosystem service assessments: Why, how, who, and for whom?

• The ability to coordinate independently contributed science is critical for the future of ES. • A lack of interoperability substantially hinders global progress toward ES monitoring. • Interoperability requires not-yet-widely-embraced shared semantic conventions. • Machine-actionable, semantically enriched data & models support interoperability. • Greater collaboration by individuals & organizations needed to achieve these benefits. Despite continued, rapid growth in the literature, the fragmentation of information is a major barrier to more timely and credible ecosystem services (ES) assessments. A major reason for this fragmentation is the currently limited state of interoperability of ES data, models, and software. The FAIR Principles, a recent reformulation of long-standing open science goals, highlight the importance of making scientific knowledge Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, and Reusable . Critically, FAIR aims to make science more transparent and transferable by both people and computers . However, it is easier to make data and models findable and accessible through data and code repositories than to achieve interoperability and reusability. Achieving interoperability will require more consistent adherence to current technical best practices and, more critically, to build consensus about and consistently use semantics that can represent ES-relevant phenomena. Building on recent examples from major international initiatives for ES (IPBES, SEEA, GEO BON), we illustrate strategies to address interoperability, discuss their importance, and describe potential gains for individual researchers and practitioners and the field of ES. Although interoperability comes with many challenges, including greater scientific coordination than today’s status quo, it is technically achievable and offers potentially transformative advantages to ES assessments needed to mainstream their use by decision makers. Individuals and organizations active in ES research and practice can play critical roles in creating widespread interoperability and reusability of ES science. A representative community of practice targeting interoperability for ES would help advance these goals.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ecosystem Services
Published
2025-03-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2025.101705
Citations
8
Primary Topic
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.84

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Interoperability for ecosystem service assessments: Why, how, who, and for whom?

Bruno Smets, Greta Adamo, Stefano Balbi, Ferdinando Villa et al.
8 citations
Ecosystem Services
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
8.84
article

Interoperability for ecosystem service assessments: Why, how, who, and for whom?

Bruno Smets, Greta Adamo, Stefano Balbi, Ferdinando Villa, Zuzana V. Harmáčková, Ainhoa Magrach, Aidin Niamir, Marcel Buchhorn, Ágnes Vári, Simon Willcock, Ioannis N. Athanasiadis, Bram Edens, Kenneth J. Bagstad, María José Sanz, Alessandra Alfieri, Flavio Affinito, Evangelia G. Drakou, Luis Morales-Salinas, Kiichiro Hayashi
article en
8 citations

Abstract

• The ability to coordinate independently contributed science is critical for the future of ES. • A lack of interoperability substantially hinders global progress toward ES monitoring. • Interoperability requires not-yet-widely-embraced shared semantic conventions. • Machine-actionable, semantically enriched data & models support interoperability. • Greater collaboration by individuals & organizations needed to achieve these benefits. Despite continued, rapid growth in the literature, the fragmentation of information is a major barrier to more timely and credible ecosystem services (ES) assessments. A major reason for this fragmentation is the currently limited state of interoperability of ES data, models, and software. The FAIR Principles, a recent reformulation of long-standing open science goals, highlight the importance of making scientific knowledge Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, and Reusable . Critically, FAIR aims to make science more transparent and transferable by both people and computers . However, it is easier to make data and models findable and accessible through data and code repositories than to achieve interoperability and reusability. Achieving interoperability will require more consistent adherence to current technical best practices and, more critically, to build consensus about and consistently use semantics that can represent ES-relevant phenomena. Building on recent examples from major international initiatives for ES (IPBES, SEEA, GEO BON), we illustrate strategies to address interoperability, discuss their importance, and describe potential gains for individual researchers and practitioners and the field of ES. Although interoperability comes with many challenges, including greater scientific coordination than today’s status quo, it is technically achievable and offers potentially transformative advantages to ES assessments needed to mainstream their use by decision makers. Individuals and organizations active in ES research and practice can play critical roles in creating widespread interoperability and reusability of ES science. A representative community of practice targeting interoperability for ES would help advance these goals.

Ecosystem ServicesVol. 72
Ikerbasque (ES), United States Geological Survey (US), United Nations (US), Organisation de Coopération et de Développement Economiques (FR), International Monetary Fund (US), Bangor University (GB), Rothamsted Research (GB), Denver Federal Center (US), Senckenberg - Leibniz Institution for Biodiversity and Earth System Research (DE), Harokopio University of Athens (GR), Basque Centre for Climate Change (ES), Czech Academy of Sciences, Global Change Research Institute (CZ), Senckenberg Biodiversity and Climate Research Centre (DE), HUN-REN Centre for Ecological Research (HU), McGill University (CA), Nagoya University (JP), Flemish Institute for Technological Research (BE), Wageningen University & Research (NL)
European Space Agency, Sight Research UK, Eusko Jaurlaritza, Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek, Directorate for Biological Sciences, U.S. Geological Survey, Economic and Social Research Council, Natural Environment Research Council, Agencia Estatal de Investigación
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
8.84
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.