It’s a match: Exploring joint emotion regulation profiles among mixed-sex couples

How do couples differ from other couples in how they regulate their own and their partner’s emotions? Although research on emotion regulation is blooming, insights into joint emotion regulation profiles—that is, the overlap between partners’ specific strategies to regulate themselves and their partner—remain limited. To address this gap, we identified joint intra- and interpersonal emotion regulation profiles in 120 mixed-sex couples; clustering couples together based on both partners’ reported intra- and interpersonal emotion regulation strategies. Additionally, we examined associations between profile-membership and well-being indicators. The identified joint emotion regulation profiles differed in three ways: (1) degree of regulation (e.g., no use of any vs. high use of all strategies), (2) strategies predominantly used; and (3) degree of similarity—or lack thereof—between partners. Together, these findings provide the first insights into the role of joint emotion regulation profiles in the health of couples and their relationships, highlighting the unique roles played by both partners in regulating their own and their partner’s emotions. Further research is needed to assess if these results generalize to inclusive samples and daily life.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Social and Personal Relationships
Published
2025-03-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/02654075251325434
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.44

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

It’s a match: Exploring joint emotion regulation profiles among mixed-sex couples

Laura Sels, Pauline Verhelst, Lesley Verhofstadt, Elise K. Kalokerinos et al.
1 citations
Journal of Social and Personal Relationships
Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
2.44
article

It’s a match: Exploring joint emotion regulation profiles among mixed-sex couples

Laura Sels, Pauline Verhelst, Lesley Verhofstadt, Elise K. Kalokerinos, Eva Ceulemans, Katharine H. Greenaway
article en
1 citations

Abstract

How do couples differ from other couples in how they regulate their own and their partner’s emotions? Although research on emotion regulation is blooming, insights into joint emotion regulation profiles—that is, the overlap between partners’ specific strategies to regulate themselves and their partner—remain limited. To address this gap, we identified joint intra- and interpersonal emotion regulation profiles in 120 mixed-sex couples; clustering couples together based on both partners’ reported intra- and interpersonal emotion regulation strategies. Additionally, we examined associations between profile-membership and well-being indicators. The identified joint emotion regulation profiles differed in three ways: (1) degree of regulation (e.g., no use of any vs. high use of all strategies), (2) strategies predominantly used; and (3) degree of similarity—or lack thereof—between partners. Together, these findings provide the first insights into the role of joint emotion regulation profiles in the health of couples and their relationships, highlighting the unique roles played by both partners in regulating their own and their partner’s emotions. Further research is needed to assess if these results generalize to inclusive samples and daily life.

Journal of Social and Personal RelationshipsVol. 42(6)
The University of Melbourne (AU), Ghent University (BE), VIB-KU Leuven Center for Microbiology (BE)
Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek, KU Leuven, Universiteit Gent, Onderzoeksraad, KU Leuven, Bijzonder Onderzoeksfonds UGent
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
2.44
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.