Assessment of Usability of Digital Side Mirror Technology Concerning Parking Speed and Accuracy

Abstract This paper focuses on the comparison of traditional and digital side mirrors in passenger cars during parallel and perpendicular parking maneuvers. The study was conducted on a closed testing ground, where data were collected through field measurements involving a relatively homogeneous group of drivers. The primary aim of the research was to evaluate how the use of digital mirrors affects parking speed and accuracy compared to traditional mirrors, and whether this new technology offers tangible benefits in terms of usability and safety. The key parameters, such as the time required to complete the parking maneuver and the accuracy of the vehicle’s positioning within the parking space, were recorded during the measurements. The data obtained from this research were then subjected to Pearson’s Chi-squared test to evaluate the drivers’ dependence and comfort with the digital side mirror technology. The analysis of the collected data revealed statistically significant differences between the two types of mirrors, with results indicating lower accuracy and higher time consumption when parking with digital mirrors compared to traditional ones. Based on these findings, it can be concluded that digital side mirrors, although representing a modern technological advancement, may have limited practical usability in terms of safety and efficiency, particularly in maneuvers requiring a high degree of precision. Therefore, the study highlights the need for further research and optimisation of this technology to ensure it can be fully utilised in everyday driving, providing drivers with comparable or greater comfort and safety than traditional side mirrors.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Acta Technologica Agriculturae
Published
2025-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2478/ata-2025-0006
Primary Topic
Ergonomics and Musculoskeletal Disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessment of Usability of Digital Side Mirror Technology Concerning Parking Speed and Accuracy

Michal Hruška, Jakub Povýšil, Tomáš Benda, Stanislav Jeleň et al.
Acta Technologica Agriculturae
Ergonomics and Musculoskeletal Disorders
article

Assessment of Usability of Digital Side Mirror Technology Concerning Parking Speed and Accuracy

Michal Hruška, Jakub Povýšil, Tomáš Benda, Stanislav Jeleň, Anna Maria Zifia, J. Bradna, Nikita Vojtěchová, Petr Benda
article en

Abstract

Abstract This paper focuses on the comparison of traditional and digital side mirrors in passenger cars during parallel and perpendicular parking maneuvers. The study was conducted on a closed testing ground, where data were collected through field measurements involving a relatively homogeneous group of drivers. The primary aim of the research was to evaluate how the use of digital mirrors affects parking speed and accuracy compared to traditional mirrors, and whether this new technology offers tangible benefits in terms of usability and safety. The key parameters, such as the time required to complete the parking maneuver and the accuracy of the vehicle’s positioning within the parking space, were recorded during the measurements. The data obtained from this research were then subjected to Pearson’s Chi-squared test to evaluate the drivers’ dependence and comfort with the digital side mirror technology. The analysis of the collected data revealed statistically significant differences between the two types of mirrors, with results indicating lower accuracy and higher time consumption when parking with digital mirrors compared to traditional ones. Based on these findings, it can be concluded that digital side mirrors, although representing a modern technological advancement, may have limited practical usability in terms of safety and efficiency, particularly in maneuvers requiring a high degree of precision. Therefore, the study highlights the need for further research and optimisation of this technology to ensure it can be fully utilised in everyday driving, providing drivers with comparable or greater comfort and safety than traditional side mirrors.

Acta Technologica AgriculturaeVol. 28(1)
Tilburg University (NL), Czech University of Life Sciences Prague (CZ)
Openalex Percentile: Top 96%
Ergonomics and Musculoskeletal Disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.