City-Agglomeration: Production and Representation of the Boundaries of Spatial Influence of Krasnodar

The article is based on the materials of the field research conducted in Krasnodar krai in the summer–autumn of 2023, as well as on the analysis of articles and projects devoted to the substantiation of spatial forms and borders of Russian urban agglomerations. The Krasnodar urban agglomeration was chosen for several reasons: (a) the intensive growth of the population of Krasnodar, (b) the “cross-border” nature of the urban agglomeration, which includes the territories of two subjects of Russian Federation—Krasnodar krai and the Republic of Adygea, divided in the Krasnodar area by a natural boundary—the Kuban River, and (с) the obvious mismatch between the large cells of administrative/municipal governance of the territories included in the urban agglomeration and the small-cell structure of the space of everyday life. The authors aim to identify the principles underlying the delineation of Krasnodar’s area of influence, to understand the mechanisms of determining the external and internal borders of the urban agglomeration, and the semantics of the graphic images constructed with their help. Attention is focused on maps as an universal tool for fixing and reproducing significant aspects of the surrounding reality. Different types of cartographic products are considered: city plans, administrative maps and territorial development schemes, analytical maps presented in scientific articles and atlases, maps based on Earth remote sensing data, folk and mental maps that project non-spatial relations into space. All maps and images are considered as a product of intellectual activity, a visual representation of knowledge/perceptions of the mapped territory. The authors conclude that the current practice of producing and representing the Krasnodar urban agglomeration borders, despite scientific justifications and technical calculations, is not so much a representation of the area of Krasnodar’s influence on the surrounding territories as a way to resolve the contradiction between the habit of thinking of urban development in terms of growth and the difficulty of practical implementation of this strategy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Regional Research of Russia
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1134/s2079970524600732
Primary Topic
Regional Socio-Economic Development Trends
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

City-Agglomeration: Production and Representation of the Boundaries of Spatial Influence of Krasnodar

А. А. Гриценко, Oľga Vendina, А. В. Шелудков
Regional Research of Russia
Regional Socio-Economic Development Trends
article

City-Agglomeration: Production and Representation of the Boundaries of Spatial Influence of Krasnodar

А. А. Гриценко, Oľga Vendina, А. В. Шелудков
article en

Abstract

The article is based on the materials of the field research conducted in Krasnodar krai in the summer–autumn of 2023, as well as on the analysis of articles and projects devoted to the substantiation of spatial forms and borders of Russian urban agglomerations. The Krasnodar urban agglomeration was chosen for several reasons: (a) the intensive growth of the population of Krasnodar, (b) the “cross-border” nature of the urban agglomeration, which includes the territories of two subjects of Russian Federation—Krasnodar krai and the Republic of Adygea, divided in the Krasnodar area by a natural boundary—the Kuban River, and (с) the obvious mismatch between the large cells of administrative/municipal governance of the territories included in the urban agglomeration and the small-cell structure of the space of everyday life. The authors aim to identify the principles underlying the delineation of Krasnodar’s area of influence, to understand the mechanisms of determining the external and internal borders of the urban agglomeration, and the semantics of the graphic images constructed with their help. Attention is focused on maps as an universal tool for fixing and reproducing significant aspects of the surrounding reality. Different types of cartographic products are considered: city plans, administrative maps and territorial development schemes, analytical maps presented in scientific articles and atlases, maps based on Earth remote sensing data, folk and mental maps that project non-spatial relations into space. All maps and images are considered as a product of intellectual activity, a visual representation of knowledge/perceptions of the mapped territory. The authors conclude that the current practice of producing and representing the Krasnodar urban agglomeration borders, despite scientific justifications and technical calculations, is not so much a representation of the area of Krasnodar’s influence on the surrounding territories as a way to resolve the contradiction between the habit of thinking of urban development in terms of growth and the difficulty of practical implementation of this strategy.

Regional Research of RussiaVol. 14(S1)
Institute of Geography (RU)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 46%
Regional Socio-Economic Development Trends
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.