Biofilm Growth on Different Materials Used in Contemporary Femoral Head Prosthesis: An In Vitro Study

<b>Background/Objectives:</b> Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) primarily results from bacterial biofilms adhering to prosthetic surfaces, making treatment challenging without prosthesis removal. This in vitro study aims to investigate whether the materials used in contemporary femoral head prosthesis influences bacterial biofilm development. <b>Methods</b>: Femoral head prostheses made of three different materials-cobalt-chrome, oxinium, and ceramic-were inoculated with either <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> or <i>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</i> in separate experiments, with each pathogen tested independently. The samples were cultured under shaking conditions at 37 °C for 96 h to promote biofilm formation. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was used to confirm the presence of biofilms, and adherent biofilms were quantified by counting colony-forming units (CFUs) after sonication. Additionally, crystal violet staining was performed to assess biofilm distribution on the femoral head surfaces. Statistical analyses compared CFU counts across the different materials. <b>Results</b>: The mean CFU counts for <i>S. aureus</i> were 7.6 × 10⁵ ± 9.7 × 10⁴ for cobalt-chrome, 6.9 × 10⁵ ± 3.6 × 10⁵ for oxinium, and 1.1 × 10⁶ ± 3.0 × 10⁵ for ceramic femoral head prostheses. For <i>P. aeruginosa</i>, the CFU counts were 2.3 × 10⁶ ± 7.2 × 10⁵, 3.7 × 10⁶ ± 2.5 × 10⁶, and 2.2 × 10⁶ ± 8.9 × 10⁵, respectively. Regardless of the bacterial strain, differences among the three materials were within one log range, and no statistical significance was observed. While biofilms were confirmed using SEM, limited adherence was observed on the bearing surface, with the biofilm predominantly localized in the taper hole. <b>Conclusions</b>: The findings suggest that the material used in contemporary femoral head prostheses has minimal impact on bacterial biofilm formation. Surgeons' choice of femoral head prosthesis material should base their material selection on factors other than PJI prevention.